Doty Jesse F, Alvarez Richard G, Ervin Timothy B, Heard Ashley, Gilbreath John, Richardson Nicholas S
Clinical Instructor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga, TN.
Professor and Chairman, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga, TN.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Sep-Oct;54(5):852-5. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
The purpose of the present study was to compare the hallux valgus deformity pressure parameters seen in standard footwear (no orthosis) versus the pressure observed in the same footwear with the addition of 3 different length orthoses. The forefoot pressure at a hallux valgus deformity was recorded with pressure sensors placed on the plantar, medial, and dorsal surface of the first metatarsal head. The participants performed walking trials without an orthosis and with orthoses of 3 different lengths. The average pressure and maximum pressure of each area was recorded for each orthosis, and comparisons were made across the groups. The plantar pressures were decreased in the full length and 3/4 length orthoses, and the dorsal pressures were increased with the use of the full-length and sulcus-length orthoses. Significant changes in medial pressure were not seen with the addition of any orthosis compared with standard footwear alone. However, a trend toward increased medial pressures was seen with the full- and sulcus-length orthoses, and the 3/4-length orthoses exhibited a trend toward decreased medial pressures. We were unable to demonstrate that the use of a custom foot orthosis significantly decreases the medial pressures on the first metatarsal head in patients with hallux valgus deformity. The 3/4-length orthosis was less likely to negatively affect the dorsal or medial pressures, which were noted to increase with the sulcus- and full-length orthoses. Our data suggest that if a clinician uses this treatment option, a 3/4-length orthosis might be a better choice than a sulcus- or full-length orthosis.
本研究的目的是比较在标准鞋类(无矫形器)中观察到的拇外翻畸形压力参数与在同一鞋类中添加3种不同长度矫形器后所观察到的压力。通过将压力传感器放置在第一跖骨头的足底、内侧和背侧表面来记录拇外翻畸形处的前足压力。参与者分别在不使用矫形器以及使用3种不同长度矫形器的情况下进行步行试验。记录每种矫形器各区域的平均压力和最大压力,并在各组之间进行比较。全长和3/4长度矫形器使足底压力降低,而使用全长和沟形长度矫形器会使背侧压力增加。与仅使用标准鞋类相比,添加任何矫形器后内侧压力均未出现显著变化。然而,全长和沟形长度矫形器呈现出内侧压力增加的趋势,而3/4长度矫形器则呈现出内侧压力降低的趋势。我们无法证明使用定制足部矫形器能显著降低拇外翻畸形患者第一跖骨头处的内侧压力。3/4长度矫形器对背侧或内侧压力产生负面影响的可能性较小,而沟形和全长矫形器会使这些压力增加。我们的数据表明,如果临床医生采用这种治疗方案,3/4长度矫形器可能比沟形或全长矫形器是更好的选择。