Chen Shiah-Lian, Huang Tsai-Wei, Liao I-Chen, Liu Chienchi
Department of Nursing, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan.
Department of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan.
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Oct;71(10):2444-53. doi: 10.1111/jan.12707. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
To develop and psychometrically test the Simulation Learning Effectiveness Inventory.
High-fidelity simulation helps students develop clinical skills and competencies. Yet, reliable instruments measuring learning outcomes are scant.
A descriptive cross-sectional survey was used to validate psychometric properties of the instrument measuring students' perception of stimulation learning effectiveness.
A purposive sample of 505 nursing students who had taken simulation courses was recruited from a department of nursing of a university in central Taiwan from January 2010-June 2010. The study was conducted in two phases. In Phase I, question items were developed based on the literature review and the preliminary psychometric properties of the inventory were evaluated using exploratory factor analysis. Phase II was conducted to evaluate the reliability and validity of the finalized inventory using confirmatory factor analysis.
The results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed the instrument was composed of seven factors, named course arrangement, equipment resource, debriefing, clinical ability, problem-solving, confidence and collaboration. A further second-order analysis showed comparable fits between a three second-order factor (preparation, process and outcome) and the seven first-order factor models. Internal consistency was supported by adequate Cronbach's alphas and composite reliability. Convergent and discriminant validities were also supported by confirmatory factor analysis.
The study provides evidence that the Simulation Learning Effectiveness Inventory is reliable and valid for measuring student perception of learning effectiveness. The instrument is helpful in building the evidence-based knowledge of the effect of simulation teaching on students' learning outcomes.
开发并对模拟学习效果量表进行心理测量学测试。
高保真模拟有助于学生培养临床技能和能力。然而,用于测量学习成果的可靠工具却很少。
采用描述性横断面调查来验证测量学生对模拟学习效果感知的工具的心理测量特性。
从台湾中部一所大学的护理系招募了505名参加过模拟课程的护理专业学生作为目的抽样样本,时间为2010年1月至2010年6月。该研究分两个阶段进行。在第一阶段,基于文献综述开发问题项目,并使用探索性因素分析评估量表的初步心理测量特性。第二阶段进行确认性因素分析以评估最终量表的信度和效度。
探索性和确认性因素分析结果表明,该工具由七个因素组成,分别命名为课程安排、设备资源、总结汇报、临床能力、问题解决、信心和协作。进一步的二阶分析表明,一个三阶因素(准备、过程和结果)与七个一阶因素模型之间具有可比的拟合度。内部一致性得到了足够的克朗巴哈系数和组合信度的支持。确认性因素分析也支持了收敛效度和区分效度。
该研究提供了证据,表明模拟学习效果量表在测量学生对学习效果的感知方面是可靠且有效的。该工具有助于建立基于证据的模拟教学对学生学习成果影响的知识体系。