Feldman Candace H, Yazdany Jinoos, Guan Hongshu, Solomon Daniel H, Costenbader Karen H
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
University of California San Francisco.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Dec;67(12):1712-21. doi: 10.1002/acr.22636.
We examined whether nonadherence to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or immunosuppressive medications (ISMs) was associated with higher subsequent acute care utilization among Medicaid beneficiaries with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
We utilized US Medicaid data from 2000-2006 to identify adults ages 18-64 years with SLE who were new users of HCQ or ISMs. We defined the index date as receipt of HCQ or ISMs without use in the prior 6 months. We measured adherence using the medication possession ratio (MPR), the proportion of days covered by total days' supply dispensed, for the 1-year post-index date. Our outcomes were all-cause and SLE-related emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations in the subsequent year. We used multivariable Poisson regression models to examine the association between nonadherence (MPR <80%) and acute care utilization, adjusting for sociodemographics and comorbidities.
We identified 9,600 HCQ new users and 3,829 ISM new users with SLE. The mean ± SD MPR for HCQ was 47.8% ± 30.3% and for ISMs was 42.7% ± 30.7%. Seventy-nine percent of HCQ users and 83% of ISM users were nonadherent (MPR <80%). In multivariable models, among HCQ users, the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of ED visits was 1.55 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.43-1.69) and the IRR of hospitalizations was 1.37 (95% CI 1.25-1.50), comparing nonadherers to adherers. For ISM users, the IRR of ED visits was 1.64 (95% CI 1.42-1.89) and of hospitalizations was 1.67 (95% CI 1.41-1.96) for nonadherers versus adherers.
In this cohort, nonadherence to HCQ and ISMs was common and was associated with significantly higher subsequent acute care utilization.
我们研究了系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的医疗补助受益人群中,不坚持服用羟氯喹(HCQ)或免疫抑制药物(ISMs)是否与随后更高的急性护理利用率相关。
我们利用2000年至2006年的美国医疗补助数据,确定年龄在18至64岁之间、新使用HCQ或ISMs的SLE成年患者。我们将索引日期定义为开始使用HCQ或ISMs且在前6个月未使用过这些药物的日期。我们使用药物持有率(MPR)来衡量依从性,即索引日期后1年内已配药总天数中实际服药天数的比例。我们的研究结果是随后一年中全因和与SLE相关的急诊科(ED)就诊及住院情况。我们使用多变量泊松回归模型来研究不依从(MPR<80%)与急性护理利用率之间的关联,并对社会人口统计学和合并症进行了调整。
我们确定了9600名新使用HCQ的SLE患者和3829名新使用ISMs的SLE患者。HCQ的平均±标准差MPR为47.8%±30.3%,ISMs的平均±标准差MPR为42.7%±30.7%。79%的HCQ使用者和83%的ISMs使用者不依从(MPR<80%)。在多变量模型中,对于HCQ使用者,与依从者相比,不依从者的ED就诊发病率比(IRR)为1.55(95%置信区间[95%CI]1.43 - 1.69),住院的IRR为1.37(95%CI 1.25 - 1.50)。对于ISMs使用者,不依从者与依从者相比,ED就诊的IRR为1.64(95%CI 1.42 - 1.89),住院的IRR为1.67(95%CI 1.41 - 1.96)。
在这个队列中,不坚持服用HCQ和ISMs的情况很常见,并且与随后显著更高的急性护理利用率相关。