Dulka Brooke N, Lynch Joseph F, Latsko Maeson S, Mulvany Jessica L, Jasnow Aaron M
Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, United States.
Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, United States.
Behav Processes. 2015 Sep;118:115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
Conflict among individuals is one of the most common forms of stressors experienced across a variety of species, including humans. Social defeat models in mice produce two phenotypic behavioral responses characterized by prolonged social avoidance (susceptibility) or continued social interaction (resistance). The resistant phenotype has been proposed as a model of resilience to chronic stress-induced depression in humans. Previously, we have found that mice that are resistant to social defeat stress display significant impairments in extinction learning and retention, suggesting that continued social interaction following the experience of social defeat may be associated with maladaptive fear responses. Here, we examined how individual differences in response to social defeat may be related to differences in cued and context fear discrimination. Following defeat, resistant mice showed increased fear to a neutral cued stimulus (CS-) compared to control and susceptible mice, but were still able to significantly discriminate between the CS+ and CS-. Likewise, both phenotypes were generally able to discriminate between the training context and neutral context at all retention intervals tested (1, 5, 14 days). However, susceptible mice displayed significantly better discrimination compared to resistant and non-defeated control mice when assessing the discrimination ratio. Thus, at a time when most animals begin exhibiting generalization to contextual cues, susceptible mice retain the ability to discriminate between fearful and neutral contexts. These data suggest that the differences observed in context and cued discrimination between susceptible and resistant mice may be related to differences in their coping strategies in response to social defeat. In particular, resistance or resilience to social defeat as traditionally characterized may be associated with altered inhibitory learning. Understanding why individual differences arise in response to stress, including social confrontation is important in understanding the development and treatment of stress related pathologies such as PTSD.
个体之间的冲突是包括人类在内的各种物种所经历的最常见的应激源形式之一。小鼠的社会挫败模型产生两种表型行为反应,其特征为长期的社会回避(易感性)或持续的社会互动(抗性)。抗性表型已被提议作为人类对慢性应激诱导的抑郁症的复原力模型。此前,我们发现对社会挫败应激具有抗性的小鼠在消退学习和记忆方面表现出显著损伤,这表明社会挫败经历后的持续社会互动可能与适应不良的恐惧反应有关。在这里,我们研究了对社会挫败反应的个体差异如何与线索性和情境性恐惧辨别差异相关。挫败后,与对照和易感小鼠相比,抗性小鼠对中性线索刺激(CS-)表现出增加的恐惧,但仍能够显著区分CS+和CS-。同样,在所有测试的记忆间隔(1、5、14天),两种表型通常都能够区分训练情境和中性情境。然而,在评估辨别率时,与抗性和未受挫败的对照小鼠相比,易感小鼠表现出显著更好的辨别能力。因此,在大多数动物开始表现出对情境线索的泛化时,易感小鼠保留了区分恐惧和中性情境的能力。这些数据表明,易感和抗性小鼠在情境和线索辨别中观察到的差异可能与它们应对社会挫败的策略差异有关。特别是,传统上所定义的对社会挫败的抗性或复原力可能与改变的抑制性学习有关。理解为什么个体在应对压力(包括社会对抗)时会出现差异,对于理解创伤后应激障碍等与压力相关的病理的发展和治疗很重要。