Tomsin K, Mesens T, Oben J, Molenberghs G, Peeters L, Gyselaers W
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2012 Jul;2(3):251. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2012.04.129. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
Pre-eclampsia (PE) has been categorised into subtypes depending on low or high cardiac output (CO) states. Are cardiac reflex responses (CRR) different between these two subtypes?
Impedance cardiography (ICG) measurements of cardiac cycle time intervals (CCTI) before and after orthostatic challenge are evaluated in the clinical phase of PE with low and high CO (LPE and HPE, respectively).
Examinations were performed in 25 LPE (CO⩽7l/min) and 16 HPE (CO⩾9l/min). A third generation ICG device using a four electrode arrangement (NICCOMO, Medis, Germany) was used to measure CCTI in supine position and after moving to upright position. The pre-ejection period (PEP) is the time-interval between ventricular depolarisation and start of aortic flow. The left ventricular ejection time (LVET) is the time-interval between opening and closing of the aortic valve. Systolic time ratio (STR) is PEP/LVET. Diastolic time (DT) is the heart period duration - (PEP+LVET). Time intervals were expressed as a percentage of the heart period duration, i.e. PEPi, LVETi and DTi. Orthostatic-induced changes from supine to upright position (cardiac reflex response or CRR) were evaluated using One-sample Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests. All CRRs were compared between LPE and HPE using Mann-Whitney U tests. Data are presented as medians (interquartile ranges).
Maternal age was comparable between LPE and HPE [29 (26-34) vs 28 (26-33) years; p=0.55]. This was also true for gestational age [34 (30-38) vs 36 (31-39) weeks; p=0.50], and pre-gestational BMI [24 (22-30) vs 25 (24-32); p=0.21]. Birth weight percentiles were lower in LPE compared to HPE [18 (5-31) vs 44 (18-83); p<0.01]. CRRs within each group are shown in Table 1. CRRs of PEP, PEPi and DT were different between LPE and HPE [p⩽0.04], whereas changes in LVET, LVETi, DTi and STR were not [p⩾0.09]. Reflex-induced changes of diastolic blood pressure and heart rate (HR) were not significantly different between LPE and HPE [p⩾0.41].
Orthostasis does not change PEP in HPE, but induces a significant increase of PEP in LPE. PEP is dependent on HR, preload, afterload and sympathetic activity. There is no difference in the reflex-induced response of HR, DBP (∼afterload), and STR (∼sympathetic activity) between the two groups. This suggests that the orthostatic-induced change in the isovolumetric contraction time in LPE is preload-induced. Our observations suggest that hemodynamic background mechanisms behind LPE and HPE are different, and support the view that these subtypes are two different clinical entities.
子痫前期(PE)已根据心输出量(CO)的低或高状态分为不同亚型。这两种亚型的心脏反射反应(CRR)是否不同?
在低心输出量和高心输出量的子痫前期临床阶段(分别为LPE和HPE),评估直立位挑战前后通过阻抗心动图(ICG)测量的心动周期时间间隔(CCTI)。
对25例LPE(CO⩽7l/分钟)和16例HPE(CO⩾9l/分钟)进行检查。使用采用四电极配置的第三代ICG设备(NICCOMO,德国Medis公司)测量仰卧位和转为直立位后的CCTI。射血前期(PEP)是心室去极化与主动脉血流开始之间的时间间隔。左心室射血时间(LVET)是主动脉瓣开放与关闭之间的时间间隔。收缩期时间比(STR)为PEP/LVET。舒张期时间(DT)是心动周期持续时间 - (PEP + LVET)。时间间隔以心动周期持续时间的百分比表示,即PEPi、LVETi和DTi。使用单样本Wilcoxon符号秩检验评估从仰卧位到直立位的直立位诱发变化(心脏反射反应或CRR)。使用Mann-Whitney U检验比较LPE和HPE之间的所有CRR。数据以中位数(四分位间距)表示。
LPE和HPE之间的产妇年龄相当[29(26 - 34)岁对28(26 - 33)岁;p = 0.55]。孕周[34(30 - 38)周对36(31 - 39)周;p = 0.50]和孕前体重指数[24(22 - 30)对25(24 - 32);p = 0.21]也是如此。与HPE相比,LPE的出生体重百分位数较低[18(5 - 31)对44(18 - 83);p < 0.01]。每组的CRR见表1。LPE和HPE之间PEP、PEPi和DT的CRR不同[p⩽0.04],而LVET、LVETi、DTi和STR的变化则无差异[p⩾0.09]。LPE和HPE之间反射诱发的舒张压和心率(HR)变化无显著差异[p⩾0.41]。
直立位不会改变HPE中的PEP,但会导致LPE中的PEP显著增加。PEP取决于心率、前负荷、后负荷和交感神经活动。两组之间心率(HR)、舒张压(DBP,后负荷)和STR(交感神经活动)的反射诱发反应没有差异。这表明LPE中直立位诱发的等容收缩时间变化是由前负荷引起的。我们的观察结果表明,LPE和HPE背后的血流动力学背景机制不同,并支持这些亚型是两种不同临床实体的观点。