Cairns Tina M, Huang Zhen-Yu, Gallagher John R, Lin Yixin, Lou Huan, Whitbeck J Charles, Wald Anna, Cohen Gary H, Eisenberg Roselyn J
Department of Microbiology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Department of Microbiology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Virol. 2015 Sep;89(18):9213-31. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01213-15. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and HSV-2 infect many humans and establish a latent infection in sensory ganglia. Although some infected people suffer periodic recurrences, others do not. Infected people mount both cell-mediated and humoral responses, including the production of virus-neutralizing antibodies (Abs) directed at viral entry glycoproteins. Previously, we examined IgGs from 10 HSV-seropositive individuals; all neutralized virus and were directed primarily against gD or gD+gB. Here, we expand our studies and examine 32 additional sera from HSV-infected individuals, 23 of whom had no recurrent disease. Using an Octet RED96 system, we screened all 32 serum samples directly for both glycoprotein binding and competition with known neutralizing anti-gD and -gB monoclonal Abs (MAbs). On average, the recurrent cohort exhibited higher binding to gD and gB and had higher neutralization titers. There were similar trends in the blocking of MAbs to critical gD and gB epitopes. When we depleted six sera of Abs to specific glycoproteins, we found different types of responses, but always directed primarily at gD and/or gB. Interestingly, in one dual-infected person, the neutralizing response to HSV-2 was due to gD2 and gB2, whereas HSV-1 neutralization was due to gD1 and gB1. In another case, virus neutralization was HSV-1 specific, with the Ab response directed entirely at gB1, despite this serum blocking type-common anti-gD and -gB neutralizing MAbs. These data are pertinent in the design of future HSV vaccines since they demonstrate the importance of both serotypes of gD and gB as immunogens.
We previously showed that people infected with HSV produce neutralizing Abs directed against gD or a combination of gD+gB (and in one case, gD+gB+gC, which was HSV-1 specific). In this more extensive study, we again found that gD or gD+gB can account for the virus neutralizing response and critical epitopes of one or both of these proteins are represented in sera of naturally infected humans. However, we also found that some individuals produced a strong response against gB alone. In addition, we identified type-specific contributions to HSV neutralization from both gD and gB. Contributions from the other entry glycoproteins, gC and gH/gL, were minimal and limited to HSV-1 neutralization. Knowing the variations in how humans see and mount a response to HSV will be important to vaccine development.
单纯疱疹病毒1型(HSV-1)和HSV-2感染许多人,并在感觉神经节中建立潜伏感染。虽然一些感染者会周期性复发,但另一些人则不会。感染者会产生细胞介导和体液免疫反应,包括产生针对病毒进入糖蛋白的病毒中和抗体(Abs)。此前,我们检测了10名HSV血清阳性个体的IgG;所有抗体都能中和病毒,且主要针对gD或gD+gB。在此,我们扩大研究范围,检测了另外32份来自HSV感染者的血清,其中23人没有复发性疾病。使用Octet RED96系统,我们直接筛选了所有32份血清样本,检测其与糖蛋白的结合以及与已知中和抗gD和抗gB单克隆抗体(MAbs)的竞争情况。平均而言,复发组对gD和gB的结合力更高,中和滴度也更高。在阻断MAbs与关键gD和gB表位的反应中也有类似趋势。当我们去除6份血清中针对特定糖蛋白的抗体时,发现了不同类型的反应,但始终主要针对gD和/或gB。有趣的是,在一名双重感染的个体中,对HSV-2的中和反应是由于gD2和gB2,而对HSV-1的中和反应是由于gD1和gB1。在另一个案例中,病毒中和是HSV-1特异性的,尽管该血清能阻断通用型抗gD和抗gB中和MAbs,但抗体反应完全针对gB1。这些数据对于未来HSV疫苗的设计具有重要意义,因为它们证明了gD和gB两种血清型作为免疫原的重要性。
我们之前表明,感染HSV的人会产生针对gD或gD+gB组合的中和抗体(在一个案例中,针对gD+gB+gC,这是HSV-1特异性的)。在这项更广泛的研究中,我们再次发现gD或gD+gB可以解释病毒中和反应,并且这两种蛋白中一种或两种的关键表位存在于自然感染人类的血清中。然而,我们也发现一些个体仅对gB产生强烈反应。此外,我们确定了gD和gB对HSV中和的型特异性贡献。其他进入糖蛋白gC和gH/gL的贡献最小,且仅限于HSV-1中和。了解人类对HSV的识别和反应方式的差异对于疫苗开发至关重要。