Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, 1 Kwanak-ro, Kwanak-gu, Seoul 151-742, South Korea; National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), 28-7 Wonnam-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-450, South Korea; Takemi Program in International Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, 1 Kwanak-ro, Kwanak-gu, Seoul 151-742, South Korea; National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), 28-7 Wonnam-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-450, South Korea.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Aug;138:241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
To increase financial protection for catastrophic illness, South Korean government expanded the National Health Insurance (NHI) benefit coverage for cancer patients in September 2005. This paper investigated whether the policy has reduced inequality in catastrophic payments, defined as annual out-of-pocket (OOP) health payments exceeding 10% annual income, across different income groups. This study used the NHI claims data from 2002 to 2004 and 2006 to 2010. Triple difference estimator was employed to compare cancer patients as a treatment group with those with liver and cardio-cerebrovascular diseases as control groups and the low-income with the high-income groups. While catastrophic payments decreased in cancer patients compared with those of two diseases, they appeared to decrease more in the high-income than the low-income group. Considering that increased health care utilization and poor economic capacity may lead to a smaller reduction in catastrophic payments for the low-income than the high-income patients, the government needs to consider additional policy measures to increase financial protection for the poor.
为了增加灾难性疾病的财务保障,韩国政府于 2005 年 9 月扩大了国民健康保险(NHI)对癌症患者的福利覆盖范围。本文研究了该政策是否降低了不同收入群体之间灾难性支出(定义为年度自付医疗费用超过年收入的 10%)的不平等。本研究使用了 2002 年至 2004 年和 2006 年至 2010 年的 NHI 理赔数据。采用三重差分估计量将癌症患者作为治疗组与患有肝脏和心脑血管疾病的患者作为对照组进行比较,并将低收入组与高收入组进行比较。与两种疾病的患者相比,癌症患者的灾难性支出有所减少,但高收入组的减少幅度似乎大于低收入组。考虑到高收入患者可能会因增加医疗保健利用率和较差的经济能力而导致灾难性支出的减少幅度小于低收入患者,政府需要考虑采取额外的政策措施来增加对贫困人口的财务保障。