Pojero Fanny, Flores-Montero Juan, Sanoja Luzalba, Pérez José Juan, Puig Noemí, Paiva Bruno, Bottcher Sebastian, van Dongen Jacques J M, Orfao Alberto
Centro de Investigación del Cáncer (Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, CSIC-USAL), Instituto Biosanitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Servicio General de Citometría y Departamento De Medicina (NUCLEUS), Universidad de Salamanca (Salamanca), Spain.
Dipartimento di Biopatologia e Biotecnologie Mediche e Forensi, Universita' degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2016 Jan;90(1):91-100. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21269. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) identification and characterization of plasma cells (PCs) is a useful tool to support diagnosis, prognostication, and monitoring of PC diseases (PCD). Currently, the number of MFC markers suited for the identification of PC remains limited. Moreover, antibody therapies against PC-associated markers further compromise the utility of the most widely used reagents (e.g., CD38). Despite markers other than CD38 and CD138 are recognized as potentially useful PC-identification markers, no study has comparatively evaluated their performance in combination with CD38 and CD138. Here we compared the utility of CD229, CD54, and CD319 for the identification of normal and aberrant PCs.
Bone marrow (BM) samples from 5 healthy controls, two noninfiltrated nonHodgkin lymphoma cases and 46 PCD patients plus 3 extraosseous plasmocytomas, and normal peripheral blood (PB) specimens, were studied.
Our results showed adequate performance of all three markers once combined with CD38. In contrast, when combined with CD138 for the identification of PC, only CD229 provided a good discrimination between PCs and all other cells for all BM and PB samples analyzed; in contrast, CD54 and CD319 showed limited utility for the identification of PCs, mainly because of significant overlap of the staining for these two markers on PCs and other myeloid cells in the sample.
From the three markers evaluated, CD229 may be considered as the most reliable marker to replace CD38 or CD138 for the identification of PCs in patients undergoing anti-CD38 or anti-CD138 therapy, until a better alternative is available.
多参数流式细胞术(MFC)对浆细胞(PC)进行鉴定和特征分析是支持浆细胞疾病(PCD)诊断、预后评估及监测的一项有用工具。目前,适用于PC鉴定的MFC标志物数量仍然有限。此外,针对PC相关标志物的抗体疗法进一步削弱了最常用试剂(如CD38)的效用。尽管除CD38和CD138之外的标志物被认为是潜在有用的PC鉴定标志物,但尚无研究对它们与CD38和CD138联合使用时的性能进行比较评估。在此,我们比较了CD229、CD54和CD319在鉴定正常和异常PC方面的效用。
研究了来自5名健康对照者、2例非浸润性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者、46例PCD患者加3例骨外浆细胞瘤的骨髓(BM)样本以及正常外周血(PB)标本。
我们的结果显示,这三种标志物与CD38联合使用时均表现出良好性能。相比之下,当与CD138联合用于PC鉴定时,对于所有分析的BM和PB样本,只有CD229能够很好地区分PC与所有其他细胞;相反,CD54和CD319在PC鉴定方面效用有限,主要是因为这两种标志物在样本中PC和其他髓系细胞上的染色存在显著重叠。
在有更好的替代标志物之前,对于接受抗CD38或抗CD138治疗的患者,从所评估的三种标志物来看,CD229可能被视为替代CD38或CD138用于鉴定PC的最可靠标志物。