Liu Junjie, Mu Hong, Wang Zhifeng, Lan Jing, Zhang Shizhou, Long Xing, Zhang Dongsheng
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University Jinan 250021, China.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Qilu Children's Hospital of Shandong University Jinan 250022, China.
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Apr 15;8(4):5943-8. eCollection 2015.
This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of upper and lower joint cavity treatment (UJCT vs. LJCT) in patients with anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDw/oR) of temporomandibular joint (TMJ).
A total of 56 patients with unilateral ADDw/oR were randomly divided into two groups: UJCT group and LJCT group. Manual reduction was done in all the patients after joint cavity rejection of sodium hyaluronate. Then, they were treated with stabilization splint for one or two months. At last, Friction index was calculated to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy at 6 to 12 months follow-up.
The maximal mouth-opening degrees in the both groups increased significantly when compared with pre-treatment group (P < 0.01), and the Friction index decreased significantly when compared with pre-treatment group (P < 0.01); In LJCT group, the degrees of maximal mouth-opening increased significantly as compared to UJCT group (P < 0.05), and Friction index were also markedly lower than that in UJCT group (P < 0.05).
In the patients with ADDw/oR of TMJ, the clinical efficacy of LJCT is superior to that of UJCT, especially in the TMJ pain relief, mouth-opening degree and mandibular movement improvement.
本研究旨在比较颞下颌关节(TMJ)不可复性盘前移位(ADDw/oR)患者上下关节腔治疗(UJCT与LJCT)的临床疗效。
将56例单侧ADDw/oR患者随机分为两组:UJCT组和LJCT组。所有患者在关节腔注射透明质酸钠后进行手法复位。然后,用稳定(牙合)垫治疗1至2个月。最后,计算摩擦指数以评估6至12个月随访时的治疗效果。
与治疗前组相比,两组的最大开口度均显著增加(P < 0.01),摩擦指数与治疗前组相比显著降低(P < 0.01);与UJCT组相比,LJCT组的最大开口度显著增加(P < 0.05),摩擦指数也明显低于UJCT组(P < 0.05)。
在TMJ的ADDw/oR患者中,LJCT的临床疗效优于UJCT,尤其是在TMJ疼痛缓解、开口度和下颌运动改善方面。