Lee J J, Brahm G, Bruni S G, Thipphavong S, Sreeharsha B
Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Br J Radiol. 2015 Sep;88(1053):20150149. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150149. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
Periampullary diverticulum (PAD) often presents as an incidental CT finding. Its significance and its effect on biliary dilation are unclear. The aim of our study was to determine if the presence of a PAD is associated with abnormal dilation of the common bile duct (CBD).
Patients with PAD were retrospectively identified from the radiology database from November 2011 to November 2012 and those with known pancreaticobiliary pathology were excluded, except patients with cholelithiasis and prior cholecystectomy. A total of 150 patients with PAD were selected as well as a control group of 150 patients with no PAD. Data with respect to demographics, PAD size and location, ductal diameter, previous cholecystectomy and liver function tests were collected. To compare the groups, the Student's t-test and χ(2) analysis were used where appropriate.
The male : female ratio was 1 : 1.2 with a median average of 71 years in the PAD group. There was no statistical difference in the CBD measurement (at the pre-ampulla and pancreatic head, and distal to confluence) between the PAD and control groups (4.8, 6.9 and 6.8 mm for the PAD group; 4.7, 6.8 and 6.4 mm for the control group; p = 0.5, 0.7 and 0.3). Also, no difference was observed in the right and left intrahepatic biliary ducts (2.7, 2.7 mm for the PAD group; 2.5, 2.6 mm for the control group; p = 0.2, 0.6). There was a significantly higher incidence of cholecystectomy history (23% vs 8.7%, p < 0.01) and cholelithiasis (22% vs 11%, p < 0.01) in the PAD group, and no difference in the liver function tests. Subgroup analysis of small vs large PAD (<20 mm, ≥20 mm) did not show a difference in the CBD and intrahepatic biliary duct measurements. When comparing cholecystectomy vs non-cholecystectomy groups, CBD measurements were significantly higher in the cholecystectomy group.
Our study confirms that PAD on its own does not lead to abnormal CBD dilatation. However, increased incidence of cholelithiasis and cholecystectomy was noted in the presence of PAD.
PAD on its own does not cause CBD dilatation.
壶腹周围憩室(PAD)常作为CT检查的偶然发现。其意义以及对胆管扩张的影响尚不清楚。我们研究的目的是确定PAD的存在是否与胆总管(CBD)异常扩张有关。
从2011年11月至2012年11月的放射学数据库中回顾性识别出患有PAD的患者,排除已知胰腺胆管疾病的患者,但患有胆结石和既往胆囊切除术的患者除外。总共选择了150例患有PAD的患者以及150例无PAD的对照组患者。收集了有关人口统计学、PAD大小和位置、导管直径、既往胆囊切除术和肝功能检查的数据。为比较两组,在适当情况下使用了学生t检验和χ²分析。
PAD组男女比例为1∶1.2,平均年龄中位数为71岁。PAD组和对照组之间在CBD测量值(壶腹前、胰头处以及汇合处远端)方面无统计学差异(PAD组分别为4.8、6.9和6.8mm;对照组分别为4.7、6.8和6.4mm;p = 0.5、0.7和0.3)。此外,左右肝内胆管也未观察到差异(PAD组分别为2.7、2.7mm;对照组分别为2.5、2.6mm;p = 0.2、0.6)。PAD组胆囊切除术史(23%对8.7%,p < 0.01)和胆结石发生率(22%对11%,p < 0.01)显著更高,肝功能检查无差异。对小PAD与大PAD(<20mm,≥20mm)的亚组分析未显示CBD和肝内胆管测量值有差异。比较胆囊切除术组与非胆囊切除术组时,胆囊切除术组的CBD测量值显著更高。
我们的研究证实,单纯的PAD不会导致CBD异常扩张。然而,在存在PAD的情况下,胆结石和胆囊切除术的发生率有所增加。
单纯的PAD不会导致CBD扩张。