Yamatsuji Tomoki, Fujiwara Yasuhiro, Matsumoto Hideo, Hato Shinji, Namikawa Tsutomu, Hanazaki Kazuhiro, Takaoka Munenori, Hayashi Jiro, Shigemitsu Kaori, Yoshida Kazuhiro, Urakami Atsushi, Uno Futoshi, Nishizaki Masahiko, Kagawa Shunsuke, Ninomiya Motoki, Fujiwara Toshiyoshi, Hirai Toshihiro, Nakamura Masafumi, Haisa Minoru, Naomoto Yoshio
Department of General Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Okayama 700-8505, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Hiroshima City Hospital, Hiroshima, Hiroshima 730-8518, Japan ; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Mol Clin Oncol. 2015 May;3(3):527-532. doi: 10.3892/mco.2015.500. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
In 2006, the Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial of S-1 for Gastric Cancer (ACTS-GC) demonstrated that S-1 is an effective adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer. Following that study, S-1 has been used as the standard adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer in Japan. However, the 1-year completion rate was only 65.8% in the ACTS-GC study and feasibility remains a critical issue. We conducted a study to evaluate the feasibility of 2 weekly administration regimens of S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer. The criteria for eligibility included histologically proven stage II (excluding T1), IIIA or IIIB gastric cancer with D2 lymph-node dissection. The patients were randomly assigned to either arm A (S-1 administration for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest) or arm B (S-1 administration for 2 weeks followed by 1 week of rest). In each arm, treatment was continued for 12 months unless recurrence or severe adverse events were observed. The primary endpoint was feasibility (protocol treatment completion rate). The secondary endpoints were safety, relapse-free survival and overall survival. A total of 47 patients were assigned to arms A or B between May, 2008 and February, 2010. During the first interim analysis, the protocol treatment completion rates in arms A and B were 83 and 100%, respectively at 6 months and 49 and 89%, respectively, at 12 months (P=0.0046). Therefore, S-1 administration for 2 weeks followed by 1 week rest was more feasible as adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer. Grade 3 adverse events in arm A included fatigue (8.0%), anorexia (8.0%), nausea (4.0%), vomiting (4.0%) and hand-foot syndrome (4.0%), whereas none were observed in arm B. There were no reported grade 4 adverse events in either arm. In conclusion, the 2-week S-1 administration followed by 1-week rest regimen appears to be a more feasible oral administration regimen for S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer.
2006年,胃癌S-1辅助化疗试验(ACTS-GC)表明,S-1是一种有效的胃癌辅助治疗方法。该项研究之后,S-1在日本一直被用作胃癌的标准辅助治疗方法。然而,在ACTS-GC研究中,1年完成率仅为65.8%,可行性仍然是一个关键问题。我们开展了一项研究,以评估S-1每周给药2次方案作为胃癌辅助化疗的可行性。入选标准包括经组织学证实的II期(不包括T1)、IIIA期或IIIB期胃癌且行D2淋巴结清扫术。患者被随机分配至A组(S-1给药4周,随后休息2周)或B组(S-1给药2周,随后休息1周)。在每组中,除非观察到复发或严重不良事件,治疗持续12个月。主要终点为可行性(方案治疗完成率)。次要终点为安全性、无复发生存期和总生存期。2008年5月至2010年2月期间,共有47例患者被分配至A组或B组。在首次中期分析时,A组和B组在6个月时的方案治疗完成率分别为83%和100%,在12个月时分别为49%和89%(P=0.0046)。因此,S-1给药2周随后休息1周作为胃癌辅助化疗更具可行性。A组3级不良事件包括疲劳(8.0%)、厌食(8.0%)、恶心(4.0%)、呕吐(4.0%)和手足综合征(4.0%),而B组未观察到任何3级不良事件。两组均未报告4级不良事件。总之,S-1给药2周随后休息1周方案似乎是S-1作为胃癌辅助化疗更可行的口服给药方案。