Furuichi Munehiro, Ito Kenta, Miyairi Isao
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Subspecialties, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Pediatr Int. 2016 Feb;58(2):113-8. doi: 10.1111/ped.12745. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
Empiric antimicrobial coverage in compromised hosts commonly includes pseudomonal coverage but often lacks coverage against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Identification of risk factors specific for S. maltophilia infection may lead to prompt initiation of appropriate antibiotics and improved outcome.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of pediatric patients with bacteremia due to S. maltophilia or Pseudomonas aeruginosa from April 2002 to July 2014 at a tertiary children's hospital. Patient demographics, underlying disease, clinical course, and treatment were compared between S. maltophilia and P. aeruginosa cases.
Nineteen children with S. maltophilia bacteremia and 49 children with P. aeruginosa bacteremia were identified. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, use of carbapenems within 7 days prior to onset (OR, 5.00; 95%CI: 1.25-20.07; P = 0.02) and previous intensive care unit stay (OR, 3.75; 95%CI: 1.13-12.47; P = 0.03) were significantly associated with S. maltophilia bacteremia compared with P. aeruginosa bacteremia. The majority of the S. maltophilia bacteremia patients had central line-associated bloodstream infection (79%), compared with the P. aeruginosa bacteremia patients (37%, P = 0.002). There were nine children (47%) who had polymicrobial infection in the S. maltophilia bacteremia group, in contrast to four (8%) in the P. aeruginosa bacteremia group (OR, 10.13; 95%CI: 2.59-39.56; P = 0.001). Consultation with an infectious diseases physician was associated with a lower rate of persistent S. maltophilia bacteremia (P = 0.04).
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia should be considered in breakthrough bacteremia in pediatric patients who receive carbapenems within 7 days prior to onset.
免疫功能低下宿主的经验性抗菌覆盖通常包括针对假单胞菌的覆盖,但往往缺乏针对嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌的覆盖。识别嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染的特定危险因素可能会促使及时开始使用适当的抗生素并改善预后。
我们对2002年4月至2014年7月在一家三级儿童医院发生嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌或铜绿假单胞菌所致菌血症的儿科患者进行了回顾性分析。比较了嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌和铜绿假单胞菌病例的患者人口统计学、基础疾病、临床病程和治疗情况。
确定了19例嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌菌血症患儿和49例铜绿假单胞菌菌血症患儿。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,与铜绿假单胞菌菌血症相比,发病前7天内使用碳青霉烯类药物(比值比[OR],5.00;95%置信区间[CI]:1.25 - 20.07;P = 0.02)和既往入住重症监护病房(OR,3.75;95%CI:1.13 - 12.47;P = 0.03)与嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌菌血症显著相关。大多数嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌菌血症患者发生中心静脉导管相关血流感染(79%),而铜绿假单胞菌菌血症患者为37%(P = 0.002)。嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌菌血症组有9例患儿(47%)发生混合感染,相比之下铜绿假单胞菌菌血症组有4例(8%)(OR,10.13;95%CI:2.59 - 39.56;P = 0.001)。与感染病医生会诊与嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌持续菌血症发生率较低相关(P = 0.04)。
对于发病前7天内接受碳青霉烯类药物治疗的儿科患者,发生突破性菌血症时应考虑嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染。