Prestes R C, Silva L B, Torri A M P, Kubota E H, Rosa C S, Roman S S, Kempka A P, Demiate I M
Department of Technology and Food Science, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Avenida Roraima, 1000, 97105-900 Santa Maria, RS Brazil.
Department of Health Sciences, Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões, Avenida 7 de Setembro, 1621, 99700-000 Erechim, Rio Grande do Sul Brazil.
J Food Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;52(7):4360-8. doi: 10.1007/s13197-014-1496-2. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of adding different starches (native and modified) on the physicochemical, sensory, structural and microbiological characteristics of low-fat chicken mortadella. Two formulations containing native cassava and regular corn starch, coded CASS (5.0 % of cassava starch) and CORN (5.0 % of regular corn starch), and one formulation produced with physically treated starch coded as MOD1 (2.5 % of Novation 2300) and chemically modified starch coded as MOD2 (2.5 % of Thermtex) were studied. The following tests were performed: physicochemical characterization (moisture, ash, protein, starch and lipid contents, and water activity); cooling, freezing and reheating losses; texture (texture profile test); color coordinates (L*, a*, b*, C and h); microbiological evaluation; sensory evaluation (multiple comparison and preference test); and histological evaluation (light microscopy). There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) for ash, protein, cooling loss, cohesiveness or in the preference test for the tested samples. The other evaluated parameters showed significant differences (p < 0.05). Histological study allowed for a qualitative evaluation between the physical properties of the food and its microscopic structure. The best results were obtained for formulation MOD2 (2.5 % Thermtex). The addition of modified starch resulted in a better performance than the native starch in relation to the evaluated technological parameters, mainly in relation to reheating losses, which demonstrated the good interaction between the modified starch in the structure of the product and the possibility of the application of this type of starch in other types of functional meat products.
本研究旨在评估添加不同淀粉(天然淀粉和改性淀粉)对低脂鸡肉香肠理化、感官、结构和微生物特性的影响。研究了两种含有天然木薯淀粉和普通玉米淀粉的配方,分别编码为CASS(5.0%木薯淀粉)和CORN(5.0%普通玉米淀粉),以及一种用物理处理淀粉(编码为MOD1,2.5%的Novation 2300)和化学改性淀粉(编码为MOD2,2.5%的Thermtex)制作的配方。进行了以下测试:理化特性(水分、灰分、蛋白质、淀粉和脂质含量以及水分活度);冷却、冷冻和再加热损失;质地(质地剖面测试);颜色坐标(L*、a*、b*、C和h);微生物评估;感官评估(多重比较和偏好测试);以及组织学评估(光学显微镜)。测试样品的灰分、蛋白质、冷却损失、内聚性或偏好测试方面没有显著差异(p>0.05)。其他评估参数显示出显著差异(p<0.05)。组织学研究能够对食品的物理性质与其微观结构之间进行定性评估。配方MOD2(2.5% Thermtex)取得了最佳结果。与天然淀粉相比,添加改性淀粉在评估的工艺参数方面表现更好,主要体现在再加热损失方面,这表明改性淀粉在产品结构中的良好相互作用以及这种类型淀粉在其他功能性肉类产品中应用的可能性。