Tavakolizadeh Sara, Vafaee Fariborz, Khoshhal Masume, Ebrahimzadeh Zahra
TMD Center, INI Hospital, Hannover, Germany.
Hamadan University of Dental Science, Hamadan, Iran.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2015 Jun;7(3):191-8. doi: 10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.191. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
The purpose of this study was to compare the coronal bone level and patient satisfaction in 1-implant and 2-implant assisted mandibular overdentures.
Twenty patients who had maladaptive mandibular dentures were treated in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The first group received 1 implant (Simple line II, Implantium, South Korea) in their mandibular midline and the second group received 2 implants in their B and D regions (according to Misch's category). If the primary stability of each implant was at least 60 ISQ, ball attachment was placed and denture relined with soft liner. After 6 weeks, retentive cap incorporated with hard acrylic resin. In the 6 and 12 months recalls, periapical digital radiograph were made and visual analogue scale questionnaires were used to record patient satisfaction. The Friedman test was done for comparing the presurgical and postsurgical parameters in each group and the U-Mann Whitney test (P<.05) was done for comparison of post-treatment results between the two groups.
All implants achieved sufficient primary stability to be immediately loaded. Patient satisfaction was high, and there were no significant differences between two groups (P>.05). In addition, mean marginal bone loss was 0.6 ± 0.67 mm in the first group and 0.6 ± 0.51 mm in the second group, after 12 month. Mean marginal bone loss showed no significant differences between two groups.
This preliminary one-year result indicated that mandibular overdentures anchored to a single implant can be a safe and cost-effective method as a starting step for implant-overdenture treatment.
本研究旨在比较单颗种植体和两颗种植体辅助下颌覆盖义齿的冠状骨水平及患者满意度。
本研究对20例下颌义齿适应性差的患者进行治疗。患者被随机分为两组。第一组在其下颌中线植入1颗种植体(Simple line II,韩国Implantium公司),第二组在其B区和D区(根据米施分类法)植入2颗种植体。如果每颗种植体的初期稳定性至少为60 ISQ,则放置球附着体并用软衬材料重衬义齿。6周后,安装与硬质丙烯酸树脂结合的固位帽。在6个月和12个月的复诊时,拍摄根尖数字X线片,并使用视觉模拟量表问卷记录患者满意度。采用弗里德曼检验比较每组术前和术后参数,采用U曼-惠特尼检验(P<0.05)比较两组治疗后的结果。
所有种植体均获得足够的初期稳定性以立即加载。患者满意度较高,两组之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。此外,12个月后,第一组平均边缘骨吸收为0.6±0.67 mm,第二组为0.6±0.51 mm。两组之间的平均边缘骨吸收无显著差异。
这一为期一年的初步结果表明,单颗种植体固位的下颌覆盖义齿作为种植覆盖义齿治疗的起始步骤,可能是一种安全且经济有效的方法。