Dunkley Cara R, Dang Silvain S, Chang Sabrina C H, Gorzalka Boris B
a Department of Psychology , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , BC , Canada.
J Sex Marital Ther. 2016 Jul 3;42(5):413-30. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2015.1061075. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
Prior research has documented various ways in which adult attachment styles are characteristic of differential behavioral and cognitive patterns within romantic relationships and sexuality. However, few studies have examined the direct influence of anxious or avoidant attachment orientation on sexual function. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of insecure attachment on sexual function. Undergraduate students completed questionnaires measuring attachment style and sexual functioning. Among women, attachment avoidance tended to be associated with impairments in all aspects of sexual function, whereas anxious attachment tended to be associated with declines in arousal, satisfaction, and ability to achieve orgasm. A different trend was seen in men: Anxious attachment tended to be associated with multiple facets of sexual dysfunction, while avoidant attachment did not correlate with any sexual function deficits and was associated with superior physiological competence. These results suggest that both anxious and avoidant attachment styles are important yet differential predictors of sexual function in men and women.
先前的研究记录了成人依恋风格在浪漫关系和性行为中表现出不同行为和认知模式的各种方式。然而,很少有研究考察焦虑或回避型依恋取向对性功能的直接影响。本研究的目的是评估不安全依恋对性功能的影响。本科生完成了测量依恋风格和性功能的问卷。在女性中,回避型依恋往往与性功能各方面的损害有关,而焦虑型依恋往往与性唤起、满意度和达到性高潮能力的下降有关。在男性中观察到不同的趋势:焦虑型依恋往往与性功能障碍的多个方面有关,而回避型依恋与任何性功能缺陷均无关联,且与较强的生理能力有关。这些结果表明,焦虑型和回避型依恋风格都是男性和女性性功能的重要但不同的预测因素。