Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, P/Bag X20, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa.
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9, Canada.
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jan;22(1):180-9. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13028. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
The accelerating rate of global change has focused attention on the cumulative impacts of novel and extreme environmental changes (i.e. stressors), especially in marine ecosystems. As integrators of local catchment and regional processes, freshwater ecosystems are also ranked highly sensitive to the net effects of multiple stressors, yet there has not been a large-scale quantitative synthesis. We analysed data from 88 papers including 286 responses of freshwater ecosystems to paired stressors and discovered that overall, their cumulative mean effect size was less than the sum of their single effects (i.e. an antagonistic interaction). Net effects of dual stressors on diversity and functional performance response metrics were additive and antagonistic, respectively. Across individual studies, a simple vote-counting method revealed that the net effects of stressor pairs were frequently more antagonistic (41%) than synergistic (28%), additive (16%) or reversed (15%). Here, we define a reversal as occurring when the net impact of two stressors is in the opposite direction (negative or positive) from that of the sum of their single effects. While warming paired with nutrification resulted in additive net effects, the overall mean net effect of warming combined with a second stressor was antagonistic. Most importantly, the mean net effects across all stressor pairs and response metrics were consistently antagonistic or additive, contrasting the greater prevalence of reported synergies in marine systems. Here, a possible explanation for more antagonistic responses by freshwater biota to stressors is that the inherent greater environmental variability of smaller aquatic ecosystems fosters greater potential for acclimation and co-adaptation to multiple stressors.
全球变化的加速引起了人们对新出现的和极端环境变化(即胁迫源)累积影响的关注,尤其是在海洋生态系统中。作为当地集水区和区域过程的综合者,淡水生态系统对多种胁迫源的综合净效应也高度敏感,但尚未进行大规模的定量综合研究。我们分析了 88 篇论文的数据,这些论文包括 286 个淡水生态系统对成对胁迫源的响应,发现总体而言,它们的累积平均效应大小小于单一效应的总和(即拮抗相互作用)。双胁迫源对多样性和功能性能响应指标的净效应分别为相加和拮抗。在单个研究中,一种简单的投票计数方法表明,胁迫源对的净效应经常更拮抗(41%)而不是协同(28%)、相加(16%)或反转(15%)。在这里,我们将反转定义为两个胁迫源的净影响与它们单一效应总和的方向(负或正)相反。虽然变暖与营养化相结合产生相加的净效应,但变暖与第二个胁迫源相结合的总体平均净效应是拮抗的。最重要的是,所有胁迫源对和响应指标的平均净效应都是拮抗或相加的,这与海洋系统中报道的协同作用更为普遍形成对比。在这里,淡水生物对胁迫源产生更拮抗响应的一个可能解释是,较小水生态系统固有的更大环境变异性促进了对多种胁迫源的更大适应和共同适应潜力。