Bajpai Neha, Bhakta Rajesh, Kumar Pratap, Rai Lavanya, Hebbar Shripad
Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, KMC Manipal , Manipal University, India .
Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, KMC Manipal , Manipal University, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 May;9(5):QC04-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12315.5970. Epub 2015 May 1.
Induction of labour (IOL) nowadays is a common procedure in obstetric practice. The success of IOL largely depends upon "favourability" or "readiness" cervix which is traditionally assessed by manual examination and Scored as Bishop Score. However, this method is limited by subjectivity and reproducibility and though done in all the patients prior to IOL, several studies have demonstrated poor correlation between Bishop Score and outcome of labour.
To evaluate the role of preinduction transvaginal ultrasonographic (TVS) cervical assessment in predicting labour outcome and to compare its performance against Bishop Score in patients undergoing induction of labour (IOL).
A tertiary medical college hospital in Southern India.
Prospective observational and investigational study.
Transvaginal ultrasound was performed in 131 patients who underwent labour induction at term with intact membranes and live fetus. Bishop Score was assessed by pervaginal examination and was compared with preinduction TVS cervical Score (parameters being cervical length, funneling, position of cervix and distance of presenting part from external os). Labour was induced within one hour of cervical assessment. The labour induction was considered successful if patient could get into active labour i.e., onset of regular uterine contractions (at interval of 2-3 minutes) and cervical dilatation of 4 cm or greater within 24 hours of induction.
Labour induction was successful in 86.9% of patients. At cut off Scores of ≥ 4, TVS cervical Score performed better than Bishop Score (Sensitivity 77% vs. 65%, Specificity 93% vs. 86%). ROC analysis indicated that Area Under Curve (AUC) was more for TVS Score (0.90, 95% CI 0.84 - 0.95), compared to Bishop Score. It was found that an increase in cervical length and distance from the os by 1 mm from their means were associated with an increase in odds for failure of induction and there by caesarean delivery by 6.5% and 11% respectively.
In women experiencing labour induction, transvaginal ultrasound score comprising of five different parameters indicated success of induction better than Bishop Score. Further, two of its components (longer cervical length and increased distance of presenting part from external os) demonstrated significant and independent prediction of the likelihood of failure of induction and risk of operative delivery.
引产如今是产科实践中的常见操作。引产的成功很大程度上取决于宫颈的“有利性”或“成熟度”,传统上通过人工检查进行评估并记为 Bishop 评分。然而,这种方法受主观性和可重复性的限制,尽管在所有引产患者中都会进行,但多项研究表明 Bishop 评分与分娩结局之间的相关性较差。
评估引产前行经阴道超声(TVS)宫颈评估在预测分娩结局中的作用,并将其与接受引产(IOL)患者的 Bishop 评分的性能进行比较。
印度南部的一所三级医学院附属医院。
前瞻性观察和研究性研究。
对 131 例足月引产且胎膜完整、胎儿存活的患者进行经阴道超声检查。通过经阴道检查评估 Bishop 评分,并与引产前行 TVS 宫颈评分(参数包括宫颈长度、漏斗形成、宫颈位置以及先露部与外口的距离)进行比较。在宫颈评估后 1 小时内进行引产。如果患者能进入活跃期分娩,即引产 24 小时内出现规律宫缩(间隔 2 - 3 分钟)且宫颈扩张 4 cm 或更大,则认为引产成功。
86.9%的患者引产成功。在截断分数≥4 时,TVS 宫颈评分的表现优于 Bishop 评分(敏感性分别为 77%和 65%,特异性分别为 93%和 86%)。ROC 分析表明,与 Bishop 评分相比,TVS 评分的曲线下面积(AUC)更大(0.90,95%CI 0.84 - 0.95)。发现宫颈长度和与外口距离从其均值每增加 1 mm,引产失败及剖宫产的几率分别增加 6.5%和 11%。
在接受引产的女性中,由五个不同参数组成的经阴道超声评分比 Bishop 评分更能准确预示引产成功。此外,其两个组成部分(宫颈长度较长和先露部与外口距离增加)对引产失败的可能性和手术分娩风险具有显著且独立的预测作用。