Peng Peng, Fuchs Douglas
Department of Special Education and Disability Studies, Graduate School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
Department of Special Education, Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2017 Jan;50(1):62-80. doi: 10.1177/0022219415594609. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
Researchers are increasingly interested in working memory (WM) training. However, it is unclear whether it strengthens comprehension in young children who are at risk for learning difficulties. We conducted a modest study of whether the training of verbal WM would improve verbal WM and passage listening comprehension and whether training effects differed between two approaches: training with and without strategy instruction. A total of 58 first-grade children were randomly assigned to three groups: WM training with a rehearsal strategy, WM training without strategy instruction, and controls. Each member of the two training groups received a one-to-one, 35-min session of verbal WM training on each of 10 consecutive school days, totaling 5.8 hr. Both training groups improved on trained verbal WM tasks, with the rehearsal group making greater gains. Without correction for multiple group comparisons, the rehearsal group made reliable improvements over controls on an untrained verbal WM task and on passage listening comprehension and listening retell measures. The no-strategy-instruction group outperformed controls on passage listening comprehension. When corrected for multiple contrasts, these group differences disappeared but were associated with moderate to large effect sizes. Findings suggest-however tentatively-that brief but intensive verbal WM training may strengthen the verbal WM and comprehension performance of young children at risk. Necessary caveats and possible implications for theory and future research are discussed.
研究人员对工作记忆(WM)训练越来越感兴趣。然而,目前尚不清楚它是否能增强有学习困难风险的幼儿的理解能力。我们进行了一项适度的研究,探讨言语工作记忆训练是否能改善言语工作记忆和篇章听力理解,以及两种方法(有策略指导训练和无策略指导训练)的训练效果是否存在差异。共有58名一年级儿童被随机分为三组:采用复述策略的工作记忆训练组、无策略指导的工作记忆训练组和对照组。两个训练组的每个成员在连续10个上学日中的每一天都接受一对一的、时长35分钟的言语工作记忆训练,总计5.8小时。两个训练组在经过训练的言语工作记忆任务上都有进步,复述组进步更大。在未对多组比较进行校正的情况下,复述组在一项未训练的言语工作记忆任务、篇章听力理解和听力复述测量方面相对于对照组有可靠的进步。无策略指导组在篇章听力理解方面的表现优于对照组。在对多重对比进行校正后,这些组间差异消失,但与中等到较大的效应量相关。研究结果表明——尽管是初步的——短暂但密集的言语工作记忆训练可能会增强有风险的幼儿的言语工作记忆和理解能力表现。本文讨论了必要的注意事项以及对理论和未来研究可能的影响。