Bollschweiler Elfriede, Hölscher Arnulf H, Schmidt Matthias, Warnecke-Eberz Ute
1 Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany ; 2 Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Chin J Cancer Res. 2015 Jun;27(3):221-30. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2015.04.04.
Patients with advanced esophageal cancer (T3-4, N) have a poor prognosis. Chemoradiation or chemotherapy before esophagectomy with adequate lymphadenectomy is the standard treatment for patients with resectable advanced esophageal carcinoma. However, only patients with major histopathologic response (regression to less than 10% of the primary tumor) after preoperative treatment will have a prognostic benefit of preoperative chemoradiation. Using current therapy regimens about 40% to 50% of the patients show major histopathological response. The remaining cohort does not benefit from this neoadjuvant approach but might benefit from earlier surgical resection. Therefore, it is an aim to develop tools for response prediction before starting the treatment and for early response assessment identifying responders. The current review discusses the different imaging techniques and the most recent studies about molecular markers for early response prediction. The results show that [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has a good sensitivity but the specificity is not robust enough for routine clinical use. Newer positron emission tomography detector technology, the combination of FDG-PET with computed tomography, additional evaluation criteria and standardization of evaluation may improve the predictive value. There exist a great number of retrospective studies using molecular markers for prediction of response. Until now the clinical use is missing. But the results of first prospective studies are promising. A future perspective may be the combination of imaging technics and special molecular markers for individualized therapy. Another aspect is the response assessment after finishing neoadjuvant treatment protocol. The different clinical methods are discussed. The results show that until now no non-invasive method is valid enough to assess complete histopathological response.
晚期食管癌(T3 - 4,N)患者预后较差。对于可切除的晚期食管癌患者,在进行食管切除术并充分清扫淋巴结之前进行放化疗或化疗是标准治疗方法。然而,只有术前治疗后出现主要组织病理学反应(原发肿瘤缩小至小于10%)的患者才会从术前放化疗中获得预后益处。使用当前的治疗方案,约40%至50%的患者显示出主要组织病理学反应。其余患者无法从这种新辅助治疗方法中获益,但可能从更早的手术切除中获益。因此,目标是开发在开始治疗前进行反应预测以及识别反应者的早期反应评估工具。本综述讨论了不同的成像技术以及关于早期反应预测分子标志物的最新研究。结果表明,[18F] - 氟脱氧葡萄糖 - 正电子发射断层扫描(FDG - PET)具有良好的敏感性,但特异性不足以用于常规临床应用。更新的正电子发射断层扫描探测器技术、FDG - PET与计算机断层扫描的联合、额外的评估标准以及评估的标准化可能会提高预测价值。存在大量使用分子标志物预测反应的回顾性研究。到目前为止,尚未应用于临床。但首批前瞻性研究的结果很有前景。未来的一个方向可能是将成像技术与特殊分子标志物相结合以实现个体化治疗。另一个方面是新辅助治疗方案结束后的反应评估。讨论了不同的临床方法。结果表明,到目前为止,尚无足够有效的非侵入性方法来评估完全组织病理学反应。