Stawicki Stanislaw P, Kent Alistair, Patil Prabhav, Jones Christian, Stoltzfus Jill C, Vira Amar, Kelly Nicholas, Springer Andrew N, Vazquez Daniel, Evans David C, Papadimos Thomas J, Bahner David P
Department of Research and Innovation, St Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States.
Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2015 Apr-Jun;5(2):80-4. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.158392.
Measurement of intravascular volume status is an ongoing challenge for physicians in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). Most surrogates for volume status, including central venous pressure (CVP) and pulmonary artery wedge pressure, require invasive lines associated with a number of potential complications. Sonographic assessment of the collapsibility of the inferior vena cava (IVC) has been described as a noninvasive method for determining volume status. The purpose of this study was to analyze the dynamic response in IVC collapsibility index (IVC-CI) to changes in CVP in SICU patients receiving fluid boluses for volume resuscitation.
A prospective pilot study was conducted on a sample of SICU patients who met clinical indications for intravenous (IV) fluid bolus and who had preexisting central venous access. Boluses were standardized to crystalloid administration of either 500 mL over 30 min or 1,000 mL over 60 min, as clinically indicated. Concurrent measurements of venous CI (VCI) and CVP were conducted right before initiation of IV bolus (i.e. time 0) and then at 30 and 60 min (as applicable) after bolus initiation. Patient demographics, ventilatory parameters, and vital sign assessments were recorded, with descriptive outcomes reported due to the limited sample size.
Twenty patients received a total of 24 IV fluid boluses. There were five recorded 500 mL boluses given over 30 min and 19 recorded 1,000 mL boluses given over 60 min. Mean (median) CVP measured at 0, 30, and 60 minutes post-bolus were 6.04 ± 3.32 (6.5), 9.00 ± 3.41 (8.0), and 11.1 ± 3.91 (12.0) mmHg, respectively. Mean (median) IVC-CI values at 0, 30, and 60 min were 44.4 ± 25.2 (36.5), 26.5 ± 22.8 (15.6), and 25.2 ± 21.2 (14.8), respectively.
Observable changes in both VCI and CVP are apparent during an infusion of a standardized fluid bolus. Dynamic changes in VCI as a measurement of responsiveness to fluid bolus are inversely related to changes seen in CVP. Moreover, an IV bolus tends to produce an early response in VCI, while the CVP response is more gradual. Given the noninvasive nature of the measurement technique, VCI shows promise as a method of dynamically measuring patient response to fluid resuscitation. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.
血管内容量状态的测量一直是外科重症监护病房(SICU)医生面临的挑战。大多数容量状态的替代指标,包括中心静脉压(CVP)和肺动脉楔压,都需要有创置管,这会带来许多潜在并发症。超声评估下腔静脉(IVC)的可塌陷性已被描述为一种确定容量状态的非侵入性方法。本研究的目的是分析SICU中接受液体冲击复苏的患者在下腔静脉可塌陷指数(IVC-CI)对CVP变化的动态反应。
对符合静脉(IV)液体冲击临床指征且已有中心静脉通路的SICU患者样本进行了一项前瞻性试点研究。根据临床指征,将冲击量标准化为在30分钟内给予500 mL晶体液或在60分钟内给予1000 mL晶体液。在开始静脉冲击前(即时间0)以及冲击开始后30分钟和60分钟(如适用)同时测量静脉CI(VCI)和CVP。记录患者的人口统计学数据、通气参数和生命体征评估结果,由于样本量有限,报告描述性结果。
20名患者共接受了24次静脉液体冲击。记录到5次在30分钟内给予500 mL的冲击量和19次在60分钟内给予1000 mL的冲击量。冲击后0、30和60分钟测量的平均(中位数)CVP分别为6.04±3.32(6.5)、9.00±3.41(8.0)和11.1±3.91(12.0)mmHg。0、30和60分钟时的平均(中位数)IVC-CI值分别为44.4±25.2(36.5)、26.5±22.8(15.6)和25.2±21.2(14.8)。
在输注标准化液体冲击期间,VCI和CVP的可观察到的变化是明显的。作为对液体冲击反应性测量的VCI的动态变化与CVP的变化呈负相关。此外,静脉冲击倾向于在VCI中产生早期反应,而CVP反应则较为缓慢。鉴于测量技术的非侵入性,VCI有望作为一种动态测量患者对液体复苏反应的方法。有必要进行更大样本量的进一步研究。