Houdijk Han, Brown Starr E, van Dieën Jaap H
Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Heliomare Rehabilitation, Research and Development, Wijk aan Zee, The Netherlands
Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015 Sep 15;119(6):696-703. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00907.2014. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
Postural control performance is often described in terms of postural sway magnitude, assuming that lower sway magnitude reflects better performance. However, people do not typically minimize sway magnitude when performing a postural control task. Possibly, other criteria are satisfied when people select the amount of sway they do. Minimal metabolic cost has been suggested as such a criterion. The aim of this study was to experimentally test the relation between sway magnitude and metabolic cost to establish whether metabolic cost could be a potential optimization criterion in postural control. Nineteen healthy subjects engaged in two experiments in which different magnitudes of sway were evoked during upright standing on a foam surface while metabolic energy expenditure, center of pressure (CoP) excursion, and muscle activation were recorded. In one experiment, sway was manipulated by visual feedback of CoP excursion. The other experiment involved verbal instructions of standing still, natural or relaxed. In both experiments, metabolic cost changed with sway magnitude in an asymmetric parabolic fashion, with a minimum around self-selected sway magnitudes and a larger increase at small compared with large sway magnitudes. This metabolic response was paralleled by a change in tonic and phasic EMG activity in the major leg muscles. It is concluded that these results are in line with the notion that metabolic cost can be an optimization criterion used to set postural control and as such could account for the magnitude of naturally occurring postural sway in healthy individuals, although the pathway remains to be elucidated.
姿势控制表现通常根据姿势摆动幅度来描述,假定较低的摆动幅度反映出更好的表现。然而,人们在执行姿势控制任务时通常不会将摆动幅度降至最低。可能的情况是,人们在选择自身摆动量时满足了其他标准。已有研究提出最小代谢成本就是这样一个标准。本研究的目的是通过实验测试摆动幅度与代谢成本之间的关系,以确定代谢成本是否可能是姿势控制中的一个潜在优化标准。19名健康受试者参与了两项实验,在站立于泡沫表面的直立姿势期间诱发不同幅度的摆动,同时记录代谢能量消耗、压力中心(CoP)偏移和肌肉激活情况。在一项实验中,通过CoP偏移的视觉反馈来操控摆动。另一项实验涉及关于静止站立、自然站立或放松站立的口头指示。在两项实验中,代谢成本均以不对称抛物线形式随摆动幅度变化,在自我选择的摆动幅度附近达到最小值,并且与大摆动幅度相比,小摆动幅度时代谢成本增加幅度更大。这种代谢反应与主要腿部肌肉中紧张性和相位性肌电图活动的变化并行。研究得出结论,这些结果与以下观点一致:代谢成本可以作为用于设定姿势控制的优化标准,因此可以解释健康个体中自然发生的姿势摆动幅度,尽管其中的具体路径仍有待阐明。