†Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, United States.
‡Nutritional Science Institute, Morinaga Milk Industry Co., Ltd. , 5-1-83, Higashihara, Zama, Kanagawa Pref. 252-8583, Japan.
J Agric Food Chem. 2015 Aug 5;63(30):6787-98. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b02189. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
Heat treatments are applied to milk and dairy products to ensure their microbiological safety and shelf lives. Types of heating processes may have different effects on protein modifications, leading to different protein digestibility. In this study, milk-based liquid nutritional formulas (simulating enteral formulas) were subjected to steam injection ultra-high-temperature treatment or in-can sterilization, and the formulas were investigated by proteomic methods and in vitro and in vivo digestion assays. Proteomic analyses revealed that in-can sterilization resulted in higher signals for N(ε)-carboxymethyllysine and dephosphorylation of Ser residues in major milk proteins than in steam-injected formula, reflecting the more severe thermal process of in-can sterilization. In vitro and in vivo digestion assays indicated that steam injection improved protein digestibility, supposedly by denaturation, while the improvement seemed to be overwhelmed by formation of aggregates that showed resistance to digestion in in-can sterilized formula. Adverse effects of heat treatment on protein digestibility are more likely to be manifested in milk-based formulas than in cow's milk. Although the differences might be of limited significance in terms of amino acid bioavailability, these results emphasize the importance of protein quality of raw materials and selection of heating processes.
热处理应用于牛奶和乳制品中,以确保其微生物安全性和保质期。加热处理的类型可能对蛋白质的修饰产生不同的影响,从而导致蛋白质的消化率不同。在这项研究中,基于牛奶的液体营养配方(模拟肠内配方)经过蒸汽喷射超高温处理或罐内灭菌,通过蛋白质组学方法以及体外和体内消化试验对配方进行了研究。蛋白质组学分析表明,与蒸汽喷射配方相比,罐内灭菌导致主要牛奶蛋白中的 N(ε)-羧甲基赖氨酸和丝氨酸残基去磷酸化的信号更高,反映了罐内灭菌更剧烈的热过程。体外和体内消化试验表明,蒸汽喷射通过变性提高了蛋白质的消化率,而在罐内灭菌的配方中形成的难以消化的聚集体似乎抵消了这种改善。热处理对蛋白质消化率的不利影响在基于牛奶的配方中比在牛奶中更为明显。尽管就氨基酸生物利用度而言,这些差异可能意义有限,但这些结果强调了原材料蛋白质质量和加热处理选择的重要性。