Shankaran Veena
Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA,
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):41. doi: 10.1007/s11864-015-0354-4.
As the cost of cancer care in the United States continues to climb at an alarming rate, it is critically important for the oncology community to begin embracing interventions that provide value to patients and society. This is particularly important in the field of colorectal cancer, where many new high-priced drugs have emerged over the past several years. While adjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFOX and capecitabine) has been shown to fall within accepted thresholds for cost-effectiveness, many interventions in the metastatic setting have not. Bevacizumab in the first- and second-line settings as well as EGFR inhibitors across all lines of therapy have been associated with unfavorable cost-effectiveness ratios in several studies conducted in the United States and other countries. A key strategy in improving the cost-effectiveness of CRC treatment in the advanced setting will therefore be to identify predictive biomarkers (e.g., RAS mutation) for therapeutic response to existing drugs as well as drugs in development so that high-priced therapies can be administered to patients most likely to benefit and avoided in those who would not.
在美国,癌症治疗费用持续以惊人的速度攀升,肿瘤学界开始采用能为患者和社会带来价值的干预措施至关重要。这在结直肠癌领域尤为重要,过去几年中出现了许多新型高价药物。虽然辅助化疗(FOLFOX和卡培他滨)已被证明在成本效益的可接受阈值范围内,但转移性结直肠癌的许多干预措施并非如此。在美国和其他国家进行的多项研究中,一线和二线使用贝伐单抗以及所有治疗线使用表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抑制剂均与不良的成本效益比相关。因此,提高晚期结直肠癌治疗成本效益的关键策略是确定现有药物以及正在研发药物治疗反应的预测生物标志物(例如RAS突变),以便将高价疗法用于最可能受益的患者,而避免用于不会受益的患者。