Park Hee Yeon, Kim Jong Yeop, Cho Sang Hyun, Lee Dongchul, Kwak Hyun Jeong
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, 1198 Guwol-dong, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-760, Republic of Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, San 5, Wonchon-dong, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 443-721, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Aug;30(4):429-35. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9735-2. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of low-dose dexmedetomidine on hemodynamics and anesthetic requirements during propofol and remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Thirty adult patients were randomly allocated to receive dexmedetomidine infusion of 0.3 μg/kg/h (dexmedetomidine group, n = 15) or comparable volumes of saline infusion (control group, n = 15). Target controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil was used for anesthetic induction and maintenance, and adjusted in order to maintain a bispectral index of 40-55 and hemodynamic stability. We measured hemodynamics and recorded total and mean infused dosages of propofol and remifentanil. For anesthesia induction and maintenance, mean infused doses of propofol (121 ± 27 vs. 144 ± 29 μg/kg/min, P = 0.04) and remifentanil (118 ± 27 vs. 150 ± 36 ng/kg/min, P = 0.01) were lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group, respectively. The dexmedetomidine group required 16 % less propofol and 23 % less remifentanil. During anesthetic induction and maintenance, the dexmedetomidine group required fewer total doses of propofol (9.6 ± 2.3 vs. 12.4 ± 3.3 mg/kg, P = 0.01) and remifentanil (9.6 ± 3.4 vs. 12.7 ± 2.6 μg/kg, P = 0.01). The change in mean arterial pressure over time differed between the groups (P < 0.05). Significantly lower mean arterial pressure was observed in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group at immediately and 5 min after pneumoperitoneum. The time to extubation after completion of drug administration did not differ between the groups (P = 0.25). This study demonstrated that a low-dose dexmedetomidine infusion of 0.3 μg/kg/h reduced propofol and remifentanil requirements as well as hemodynamic change by pneumoperitoneum without delayed recovery during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
本研究的目的是评估低剂量右美托咪定对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者在丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼麻醉期间血流动力学及麻醉需求的影响。30例成年患者被随机分为两组,分别接受0.3μg/kg/h的右美托咪定输注(右美托咪定组,n = 15)或等量的生理盐水输注(对照组,n = 15)。采用丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼靶控输注进行麻醉诱导和维持,并根据需要调整输注速度以维持脑电双频指数在40 - 55以及血流动力学稳定。我们测量了血流动力学指标,并记录了丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼的总输注剂量及平均输注剂量。在麻醉诱导和维持阶段,右美托咪定组丙泊酚的平均输注剂量(121±27 vs. 144±29μg/kg/min,P = 0.04)和瑞芬太尼的平均输注剂量(118±27 vs. 150±36ng/kg/min,P = 0.01)均低于对照组。右美托咪定组所需的丙泊酚减少了16%,瑞芬太尼减少了23%。在麻醉诱导和维持期间,右美托咪定组所需的丙泊酚总剂量(9.6±2.3 vs. 12.4±3.3mg/kg,P = 0.01)和瑞芬太尼总剂量(9.6±3.4 vs. 12.7±2.6μg/kg,P = 0.01)也更少。两组间平均动脉压随时间的变化存在差异(P < 0.05)。在气腹即刻及气腹后5分钟时,右美托咪定组的平均动脉压显著低于对照组。给药结束后至拔管的时间在两组间无差异(P = 0.25)。本研究表明,在腹腔镜胆囊切除术的丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼麻醉中,0.3μg/kg/h的低剂量右美托咪定输注可降低丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼的需求量,并减轻气腹引起的血流动力学变化,且不延迟苏醒。