Morecroft Charles W, Mackridge Adam J, Stokes Elizabeth C, Gray Nicola J, Wilson Sarah E, Ashcroft Darren M, Mensah Noah, Pickup Graham B
School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 10;5(7):e006934. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006934.
To evaluate and inform emergency supply of prescription-only medicines by community pharmacists (CPs), including how the service could form an integral component of established healthcare provision to maximise adherence.
Mixed methods. 4 phases: prospective audit of emergency supply requests for prescribed medicines (October-November 2012 and April 2013); interviews with CPs (February-April 2013); follow-up interviews with patients (April-May 2013); interactive feedback sessions with general practice teams (October-November 2013).
22 community pharmacies and 6 general practices in Northwest England.
27 CPs with experience of dealing with requests for emergency supplies; 25 patients who received an emergency supply of a prescribed medicine; 58 staff at 6 general practices.
Clinical audit in 22 pharmacies over two 4-week periods reported that 526 medicines were requested by 450 patients. Requests peaked over a bank holiday and around weekends. A significant number of supplies were made during practice opening hours. Most requests were for older patients and for medicines used in long-term conditions. Difficulty in renewing repeat medication (forgetting to order, or prescription delays) was the major reason for requests. The majority of medicines were 'loaned' in advance of a National Health Service (NHS) prescription. Interviews with CPs and patients indicated that continuous supply had a positive impact on medicines adherence, removing the need to access urgent care. General practice staff were surprised and concerned by the extent of emergency supply episodes.
CPs regularly provide emergency supplies to patients who run out of their repeat medication, including during practice opening hours. This may aid adherence. There is currently no feedback loop, however, to general practice. Patient care and interprofessional communication may be better served by the introduction of a formally structured and funded NHS emergency supply service from community pharmacies, with ongoing optimisation of repeat prescribing.
评估并为社区药剂师提供的处方药紧急供应提供信息,包括该服务如何成为既定医疗保健服务的一个组成部分,以最大限度地提高依从性。
混合方法。共4个阶段:对处方药紧急供应请求进行前瞻性审核(2012年10月至11月以及2013年4月);对社区药剂师进行访谈(2013年2月至4月);对患者进行随访访谈(2013年4月至5月);与全科医疗团队进行互动反馈会议(2013年10月至11月)。
英格兰西北部的22家社区药房和6家全科医疗机构。
27名有处理紧急供应请求经验的社区药剂师;25名接受过处方药紧急供应的患者;6家全科医疗机构的58名工作人员。
在22家药房进行的为期两个4周的临床审核报告称,450名患者请求了526种药品。请求量在银行假日和周末前后达到峰值。大量供应是在医疗机构营业时间内进行的。大多数请求来自老年患者,且是用于长期病症的药品。重复配药困难(忘记订购或处方延误)是请求的主要原因。大多数药品是在国民医疗服务体系(NHS)处方之前“借出”的。对社区药剂师和患者的访谈表明,持续供应对药品依从性有积极影响,无需寻求紧急护理。全科医疗工作人员对紧急供应事件的程度感到惊讶和担忧。
社区药剂师经常为重复配药用完的患者提供紧急供应,包括在医疗机构营业时间内。这可能有助于提高依从性。然而,目前没有向全科医疗的反馈回路。引入由社区药房提供的正式结构化且有资金支持的NHS紧急供应服务,并持续优化重复处方,可能会更好地服务患者护理和跨专业沟通。