Suppr超能文献

使用一组新提出的死因编码进行婴儿意外猝死率的国际比较。

International comparison of sudden unexpected death in infancy rates using a newly proposed set of cause-of-death codes.

作者信息

Taylor Barry J, Garstang Joanna, Engelberts Adele, Obonai Toshimasa, Cote Aurore, Freemantle Jane, Vennemann Mechtild, Healey Matt, Sidebotham Peter, Mitchell Edwin A, Moon Rachel Y

机构信息

Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Division of Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 2015 Nov;100(11):1018-23. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308239. Epub 2015 Jul 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comparing rates of sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) in different countries and over time is difficult, as these deaths are certified differently in different countries, and, even within the same jurisdiction, changes in this death certification process have occurred over time.

AIMS

To identify if International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) codes are being applied differently in different countries, and to develop a more robust tool for international comparison of these types of deaths.

METHODS

Usage of six ICD-10 codes, which code for the majority of SUDI, was compared for the years 2002-2010 in eight high-income countries.

RESULTS

There was a great variability in how each country codes SUDI. For example, the proportion of SUDI coded as sudden infant death syndrome (R95) ranged from 32.6% in Japan to 72.5% in Germany. The proportion of deaths coded as accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed (W75) ranged from 1.1% in Germany to 31.7% in New Zealand. Japan was the only country to consistently use the R96 code, with 44.8% of SUDI attributed to that code. The lowest, overall, SUDI rate was seen in the Netherlands (0.19/1000 live births (LB)), and the highest in New Zealand (1.00/1000 LB). SUDI accounted for one-third to half of postneonatal mortality in 2002-2010 for all of the countries except for the Netherlands.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed set of ICD-10 codes encompasses the codes used in different countries for most SUDI cases. Use of these codes will allow for better international comparisons and tracking of trends over time.

摘要

背景

比较不同国家以及不同时期的婴儿猝死综合征(SUDI)发生率存在困难,因为这些死亡在不同国家的认证方式不同,而且即使在同一司法管辖区内,死亡认证过程也随时间发生了变化。

目的

确定国际疾病分类第10版(ICD - 10)编码在不同国家的应用是否存在差异,并开发一种更可靠的工具用于这些类型死亡的国际比较。

方法

对八个高收入国家在2002 - 2010年期间六种ICD - 10编码的使用情况进行了比较,这六种编码涵盖了大多数SUDI病例。

结果

各国对SUDI的编码方式差异很大。例如,编码为婴儿猝死综合征(R95)的SUDI比例在日本为32.6%,在德国为72.5%。编码为床上意外窒息和勒死(W75)的死亡比例在德国为1.1%,在新西兰为31.7%。日本是唯一持续使用R96编码的国家,44.8%的SUDI归因于该编码。总体而言,荷兰的SUDI发生率最低(0.19/1000活产儿(LB)),新西兰最高(1.00/1000 LB)。除荷兰外,2002 - 2010年期间所有国家的SUDI占新生儿后期死亡率的三分之一至一半。

结论

提议的这组ICD - 10编码涵盖了不同国家用于大多数SUDI病例的编码。使用这些编码将有助于更好地进行国际比较并跟踪长期趋势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验