Xu T, Liu Y, Dou S, Li F, Guan X, Zhu G
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Oral Oncol. 2015 Sep;51(9):875-9. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
To evaluate the clinical efficacies and toxicities of induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant cisplatin-chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or cetuximab-radiotherapy (ERT) in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
Previously untreated patients with stage III-IVb NPC were eligible. They were randomized to CRT arm: intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m(2)/w) or ERT arm: IMRT with weekly cetuximab (loading dose of 400 mg/m(2) followed by weekly doses of 250 mg/m(2)). Two cycles of induction chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) d1 and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) d1) were administered to both arms. Endpoints were survivals, toxicities and quality of life (QoL).
Because of the unexpectedly high rates of grade 3/4 mucositis observed in the ERT arm, the study was closed ahead of schedule. A total of 44 patients (23 in CRT arm and 21 in ERT arm) were enrolled. All patients completed the scheduled induction chemotherapy and radical radiotherapy. The results showed better compliance (P<0.001) with more oral mucositis, acneiform rash and dysphagia (P<0.05) of cetuximab. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) were achieved as 78.3% and 85.7% (P=0.547) in CRT and ERT arm, respectively. In the analysis of QoL, the addition of cetuximab to radiotherapy temporarily increased the adverse symptoms but did not result in long-term dysfunction.
ERT was not more efficacious than CRT but was more likely to cause acute adverse events in LA NPC. The recommended treatment modality was still concurrent cisplatin-IMRT. The combination of TP induction chemotherapy and concurrent cetuximab-radiotherapy should only be used in selected patients.
评估诱导化疗序贯顺铂同步放化疗(CRT)或西妥昔单抗放疗(ERT)在局部晚期鼻咽癌(NPC)中的临床疗效和毒性。
纳入先前未接受治疗的III-IVb期NPC患者。将他们随机分为CRT组:调强放疗(IMRT)联合每周顺铂(30mg/m²/周)或ERT组:IMRT联合每周西妥昔单抗(初始剂量400mg/m²,随后每周剂量250mg/m²)。两组均给予两个周期的诱导化疗(多西他赛75mg/m² d1和顺铂80mg/m² d1)。观察终点为生存率、毒性和生活质量(QoL)。
由于ERT组3/4级黏膜炎发生率意外高,研究提前结束。共纳入44例患者(CRT组23例,ERT组21例)。所有患者均完成了预定的诱导化疗和根治性放疗。结果显示西妥昔单抗的依从性更好(P<0.001),但口腔黏膜炎、痤疮样皮疹和吞咽困难更多(P<0.05)。CRT组和ERT组的3年无病生存率(DFS)分别为78.3%和85.7%(P=0.547)。在QoL分析中,放疗联合西妥昔单抗暂时增加了不良症状,但未导致长期功能障碍。
在局部晚期鼻咽癌中,ERT并不比CRT更有效,但更易引起急性不良事件。推荐的治疗方式仍是顺铂同步IMRT。TP诱导化疗联合西妥昔单抗同步放疗仅应在特定患者中使用。