Scicinski Jan, Oronsky Bryan, Ning Shoucheng, Knox Susan, Peehl Donna, Kim Michelle M, Langecker Peter, Fanger Gary
EpicentRx, Inc., 800 W El Camino Real, Suite 180, Mountain View, CA 94040, United States.
EpicentRx, Inc., 800 W El Camino Real, Suite 180, Mountain View, CA 94040, United States.
Redox Biol. 2015 Dec;6:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
The endogenous mediator of vasodilation, nitric oxide (NO), has been shown to be a potent radiosensitizer. However, the underlying mode of action for its role as a radiosensitizer - while not entirely understood - is believed to arise from increased tumor blood flow, effects on cellular respiration, on cell signaling, and on the production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS), that can act as radiosensitizers in their own right. NO activity is surprisingly long-lived and more potent in comparison to oxygen. Reports of the effects of NO with radiation have often been contradictory leading to confusion about the true radiosensitizing nature of NO. Whether increasing or decreasing tumor blood flow, acting as radiosensitizer or radioprotector, the effects of NO have been controversial. Key to understanding the role of NO as a radiosensitizer is to recognize the importance of biological context. With a very short half-life and potent activity, the local effects of NO need to be carefully considered and understood when using NO as a radiosensitizer. The systemic effects of NO donors can cause extensive side effects, and also affect the local tumor microenvironment, both directly and indirectly. To minimize systemic effects and maximize effects on tumors, agents that deliver NO on demand selectively to tumors using hypoxia as a trigger may be of greater interest as radiosensitizers. Herein we discuss the multiple effects of NO and focus on the clinical molecule RRx-001, a hypoxia-activated NO donor currently being investigated as a radiosensitizer in the clinic.
内源性血管舒张介质一氧化氮(NO)已被证明是一种有效的放射增敏剂。然而,其作为放射增敏剂的潜在作用模式——虽然尚未完全了解——被认为源于肿瘤血流增加、对细胞呼吸、细胞信号传导以及活性氧和氮物种(RONS)产生的影响,而RONS本身就可以作为放射增敏剂。与氧气相比,NO的活性具有惊人的长寿命且更强。关于NO与辐射联合作用的报道常常相互矛盾,这导致人们对NO真正的放射增敏性质感到困惑。无论增加还是减少肿瘤血流,作为放射增敏剂还是放射防护剂,NO的作用一直存在争议。理解NO作为放射增敏剂作用的关键在于认识到生物学背景的重要性。由于NO半衰期极短且活性很强,在将NO用作放射增敏剂时,需要仔细考虑和理解其局部效应。NO供体的全身效应可导致广泛的副作用,并且还会直接和间接地影响局部肿瘤微环境。为了将全身效应降至最低并最大化对肿瘤的作用,以缺氧为触发因素按需将NO选择性递送至肿瘤的药物作为放射增敏剂可能更受关注。在此,我们讨论NO的多种作用,并重点关注临床分子RRx-001,这是一种缺氧激活的NO供体,目前正在临床上作为放射增敏剂进行研究。