J Behav Addict. 2012 Sep;1(3):106-14. doi: 10.1556/JBA.1.2012.003.
Background and aims Limited treatment options are available for trichotillomania (TTM) and most have modest outcomes. Suboptimal treatment results may be due to the failure of existing approaches to address all TTM styles. Methods Thirty-eight DSM-IV TTM participants were randomly assigned across two study sites to Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) -enhanced cognitive-behavioral treatment (consisting of an 11-week acute treatment and 3-month maintenance treatment) or a minimal attention control (MAC) condition. MAC participants had active treatment after the 11-week control condition. Follow-up study assessments were conducted three and six months after the maintenance period. Results Open trial treatment resulted in significant improvement in TTM severity, emotion regulation (ER) capacity, experiential avoidance, anxiety and depression with changes generally maintained over time. In the randomized controlled trial, those with active treatment had greater improvement than those in the MAC condition for both TTM severity and ER capacity. Correlations between changes in TTM severity and ER capacity were not reported at post-treatment but did occur in maintenance and follow-up indicating reduced TTM severity with improved ER capacity. Conclusions DBT-enhanced cognitive-behavioral treatment is a promising treatment for TTM. Future studies should compare this approach to other credible treatment interventions and investigate the efficacy of this approach in more naturalistic samples with greater comorbidity.
背景与目的
对于拔毛癖(TTM),目前的治疗方法有限,且大多数治疗效果并不理想。治疗效果不理想可能是因为现有的方法未能解决所有 TTM 类型。
方法
38 名 DSM-IV TTM 参与者被随机分配到两个研究地点,分别接受辩证行为疗法(DBT)增强型认知行为治疗(包括为期 11 周的急性治疗和 3 个月的维持治疗)或最小关注控制(MAC)条件。MAC 参与者在 11 周的对照期后接受积极治疗。在维持期结束后的三个月和六个月进行随访研究评估。
结果
开放性试验治疗导致 TTM 严重程度、情绪调节(ER)能力、体验回避、焦虑和抑郁显著改善,这些变化通常随着时间的推移而保持。在随机对照试验中,与 MAC 组相比,积极治疗组在 TTM 严重程度和 ER 能力方面都有更大的改善。治疗后未报告 TTM 严重程度和 ER 能力变化之间的相关性,但在维持期和随访期确实存在相关性,表明 ER 能力的提高与 TTM 严重程度的降低有关。
结论
DBT 增强型认知行为治疗是 TTM 的一种有前途的治疗方法。未来的研究应将这种方法与其他可信的治疗干预措施进行比较,并在具有更大共病的更自然的样本中研究这种方法的疗效。