Emrich Oliver M D, Milachowski Klaus A, Strohmeier Martin
, Rosenthalstraße 17, D-67069, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland,
MMW Fortschr Med. 2015 Jul;157 Suppl 5:9-16. doi: 10.1007/s15006-015-3307-x. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
Muscle relaxants are widely used to treat low back pain (LBP), one of the most frequent health problems in industrialized countries. For this indication, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recently had imposed restrictions for some muscle relaxants, anti-inflammatories and analgesics; Tetrazepam even had to be withdrawn from the market. Therefore methocarbamol remains the only approved muscle relaxant. Methocarbamol is well-established for the treatment of LBP associated with myofascial components, although more recent clinical studies have not been published. Therefore this publication summarizes and revaluates post-hoc data of an efficiency study of methocarbamol, that was performed in 2002, but had not been published yet.
This was a randomized, placebo controlled multi-centre study. Inclusion criteria were acute low back pain for at least 24 h associated with spasms in the pelvic/lumbar region and restriction of mobility. Patients were randomly assigned to a group treated with orally administered Ortoton® (n = 98) or placebo (n = 104). Drugs were administered for up to 8 days, but treatment of individual patients was discontinued as soon as a pain-free state was achieved. Individual pain perception was quantified by means of a visual analog scale (VAS). The fingertip-to-floor distance was measured as an indicator of lumbar flexion. Mobility restrictions were also assessed by a modified Schober's test. In addition, a questionnaire was used by patients and physicians to rate the efficacy of treatment.
In the methocarbamol group 44% of the patients pre-terminated due to complete pain relief (placebo: 18%) and 19% discontinued because the treatment was considered ineffective (placebo 52%, p < 0,0001). Measures of mobility (fingertip-to-floor distance, Schober's test) and improvement of mobility as perceived by physician and patient at the individual end of study all were clearly in favor of the patients treated with methocarbamol. At the final visit, 67% of the patients who had received Ortoton® (35% of placebo patients) and 70% of their physicians (control group: 36%) considered the treatment to be effective. No severe adverse effects were observed during the study (7 symptoms in 5 patients).
This study showed that methocarbamol, orally administered, is an efficient and well-tolerated therapeutic option for patients suffering from acute LBP and the typically associated restrictions of mobility.
肌肉松弛剂被广泛用于治疗腰痛(LBP),这是工业化国家最常见的健康问题之一。针对这一适应症,欧洲药品管理局(EMA)最近对一些肌肉松弛剂、抗炎药和镇痛药实施了限制;替扎西泮甚至不得不退出市场。因此,美索巴莫仍然是唯一被批准的肌肉松弛剂。美索巴莫在治疗与肌筋膜成分相关的腰痛方面已得到充分确立,尽管最近尚未发表临床研究。因此,本出版物总结并重新评估了2002年进行但尚未发表的美索巴莫疗效研究的事后数据。
这是一项随机、安慰剂对照的多中心研究。纳入标准为急性腰痛至少24小时,伴有骨盆/腰椎区域痉挛和活动受限。患者被随机分为口服Ortoton®治疗组(n = 98)或安慰剂组(n = 104)。药物给药长达8天,但一旦患者达到无痛状态,个体治疗即停止。个体疼痛感知通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行量化。测量指尖到地面的距离作为腰椎前屈的指标。活动受限也通过改良的肖伯试验进行评估。此外,患者和医生使用问卷对治疗效果进行评分。
在美索巴莫组中,44%的患者因疼痛完全缓解而提前终止治疗(安慰剂组:18%),19%的患者因认为治疗无效而停药(安慰剂组52%,p < 0.0001)。活动度测量(指尖到地面的距离、肖伯试验)以及医生和患者在研究结束时个体感知的活动度改善均明显有利于接受美索巴莫治疗的患者。在最后一次随访中,67%接受Ortoton®治疗的患者(安慰剂组患者为35%)及其70%的医生(对照组:36%)认为治疗有效。研究期间未观察到严重不良反应(5名患者出现7种症状)。
本研究表明,口服美索巴莫对患有急性腰痛及典型相关活动受限的患者是一种有效且耐受性良好的治疗选择。