Hancock Mark J, Maher Chris M, Petocz Peter, Lin Chung-Wei Christine, Steffens Daniel, Luque-Suarez Alejandro, Magnussen John S
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, 2121, North Ryde, Australia.
Musculoskeletal Division, The George Institute for Global Health, The University of Sydney, 321 Kent St, 2000, Sydney, Australia.
Spine J. 2015 Nov 1;15(11):2360-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
The clinical importance of lumbar pathology identified on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains unclear. It is plausible that pathology seen on MRI is a risk factor for a recurrence of low back pain (LBP); however, to our knowledge, this has not been investigated by previous studies.
The aim was to investigate whether lumbar pathology, identifiable on MRI, increases the risk of a recurrence of LBP.
This was a prospective inception cohort study with 1-year follow-up.
Seventy-six people who had recovered from an episode of LBP within the previous 3 months were included.
The primary outcome was time to recurrence of LBP, which was determined by contacting participants at 2-month intervals for 12 months.
All participants underwent a baseline assessment including MRI scan and completion of a questionnaire, which assessed a range of potential risk factors for recurrence. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were reported for the presence of a range of MRI findings. The primary analysis investigated the predictive value of two clinical features (age and number of previous episodes) and six MRI findings (disc degeneration, high intensity zone, Modic changes, disc herniation, facet joint arthrosis, and spondylolisthesis) in a multivariate Cox regression model. We decided a priori that dichotomous predictors with hazard ratios (HRs) of greater than 1.5 or less than 0.67 would be considered potentially clinically important and justify further investigation.
Of the eight predictors entered into the primary multivariate model, three (disc degeneration, high intensity zone, and number of previous episodes) met our a priori threshold for potential importance. Participants with disc degeneration score greater than or equal to 3 (Pfirrmann scale) had a HR of 1.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-8.53) compared with those without. Patients with high intensity zone had an HR of 1.84 (95% CI 0.94-3.59) compared with those without. For every additional previous episode, participants had an HR of 1.04 (95% CI 1.02-1.07).
We identified promising risk factors for a recurrence of LBP, which should be further investigated in larger trials. The findings suggest that pathology seen on MRI plays a potentially important role in recurrence of LBP.
磁共振成像(MRI)检查出的腰椎病变的临床重要性仍不明确。MRI显示的病变可能是腰痛(LBP)复发的危险因素;然而,据我们所知,此前尚无研究对此进行过调查。
研究MRI可识别的腰椎病变是否会增加LBP复发的风险。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究,随访1年。
纳入76名在过去3个月内从一次LBP发作中康复的患者。
主要观察指标是LBP复发时间,通过在12个月内每隔2个月联系参与者来确定。
所有参与者均接受包括MRI扫描和填写问卷在内的基线评估,问卷评估了一系列复发的潜在危险因素。报告MRI扫描结果中一系列MRI表现的存在情况。主要分析在多变量Cox回归模型中研究了两个临床特征(年龄和既往发作次数)和六个MRI表现(椎间盘退变、高强度区、Modic改变、椎间盘突出、小关节骨关节炎和椎体滑脱)的预测价值。我们事先决定,危险比(HR)大于1.5或小于0.67的二分预测因子将被视为潜在的临床重要因素,并值得进一步研究。
在纳入主要多变量模型的八个预测因子中,有三个(椎间盘退变、高强度区和既往发作次数)达到了我们事先设定的潜在重要性阈值。与无椎间盘退变的参与者相比,椎间盘退变评分为3级及以上(Pfirrmann分级)的参与者HR为1.89(95%置信区间[CI]0.42 - 8.53)。有高强度区的患者与无高强度区的患者相比HR为1.84(95%CI 0.94 - 3.59)。既往每增加一次发作,参与者的HR为1.04(95%CI 1.02 - 1.07)。
我们确定了LBP复发的有前景的危险因素,应在更大规模的试验中进一步研究。研究结果表明,MRI显示的病变在LBP复发中可能起重要作用。