Lin Zexin, Yang Yilin, Huang Yongliang, Liang Junjie, Lu Fang, Lao Xuejun
Department of General Surgery, The First Clinical Medicine School of Jinan University, Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Department of General Surgery, The First Clinical Medicine School of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Mol Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul;3(4):959-967. doi: 10.3892/mco.2015.572. Epub 2015 May 15.
Bevacizumab has demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) when combined with chemotherapy. Several randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy and toxicity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) against bevacizumab have been reported. The present meta-analysis was conducted to identify the potentially significant benefit of the combined treatment regimens in patients with mCRC. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for the randomized controlled trials published on or before September 2014, which compared the efficacy and toxicity of VEGFR TKIs with bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in patients with mCRC. The primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were the toxicity profiles. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for response rate and adverse events (AEs) were calculated, as well as hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS. The final analysis included 4 studies comprising a total of 1,929 intent-to-treat patients with mCRC, which compared VEGFR TKIs (cediranib and axitinib) plus chemotherapy with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. Results demonstrated that VEGFR TKIs plus chemotherapy significantly resulted in a modest but significantly shorter PFS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00-1.25; P=0.05] compared with that of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy but not in OS (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.88-1.17; P=0.87) and ORR (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.85-1.05; P=0.30). VEGFR TKIs treatment showed a less favorable AE profile compared with bevacizumab, with higher rates of grade-III/IV diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, whereas a higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy associated with the bevacizumab group was observed. In conclusion, the addition of VEGFR TKIs to chemotherapy resulted in a modest but significantly shorter PFS but not in OS and ORR compared with bevacizumab. The VEGFR TKIs group showed a less favorable AE profile with higher rates of diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, whereas a higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy associated with the bevacizumab was observed.
贝伐单抗与化疗联合应用时已证明对转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者有生存获益。已有多项随机临床试验报告了比较血管内皮生长因子受体(VEGFR)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)与贝伐单抗的疗效和毒性。进行本荟萃分析以确定联合治疗方案对mCRC患者的潜在显著益处。检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库中2014年9月或之前发表的随机对照试验,这些试验比较了VEGFR TKIs与贝伐单抗联合化疗在mCRC患者中的疗效和毒性。主要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和总缓解率(ORR),次要终点为毒性特征。计算了缓解率和不良事件(AE)的相对风险(RRs)及95%置信区间(CIs),以及PFS和OS的风险比(HRs)。最终分析纳入4项研究,共1929例意向性治疗的mCRC患者,比较了VEGFR TKIs(西地尼布和阿昔替尼)加化疗与贝伐单抗加化疗的疗效。结果表明,与贝伐单抗加化疗相比,VEGFR TKIs加化疗显著导致PFS适度但显著缩短[风险比(HR),1.12;95%CI,1.00 - 1.25;P = 0.05],但OS(HR,1.10;95%CI,0.88 - 1.17;P = 0.87)和ORR(RR,0.95;95%CI,0.85 - 1.05;P = 0.30)无差异。与贝伐单抗相比,VEGFR TKIs治疗的AE特征较差,III/IV级腹泻、疲劳、高血压、中性粒细胞减少和血小板减少的发生率较高,而贝伐单抗组周围神经病变的发生率较高。总之,与贝伐单抗相比,VEGFR TKIs加化疗导致PFS适度但显著缩短,但OS和ORR无差异。VEGFR TKIs组的AE特征较差,腹泻、疲劳、高血压、中性粒细胞减少和血小板减少的发生率较高,而观察到贝伐单抗相关的周围神经病变发生率较高。