Rashid T G, De Ridder D, Van der Aa F
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.
World J Urol. 2015 Sep;33(9):1235-41. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1622-4. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
Mid-urethral slings are currently considered to be the gold standard for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence, replacing bladder neck suspension techniques which previously occupied this position. In recent years, however, there have been concerns with regard to the use of synthetic material in vaginal surgery.
We performed a review of the literature to discuss the role of bladder neck suspension techniques in the current clinical setting.
Bladder neck suspension techniques consist of vaginal techniques, needle suspension techniques and retropubic techniques. The latter two techniques have been proven to offer durable outcomes for stress urinary incontinence. As compared to autologous slings, the long-term success rates may be considered inferior, but so is the rate of complication, resulting in higher patient satisfaction. Bladder neck suspension techniques may have a role in treating recurrent and/or persisting stress urinary incontinence after (failed) sling surgery and remain of particular interest in patients with stress urinary incontinence when performing concomitant surgery, for example for prolapse.
目前,中段尿道吊带被认为是压力性尿失禁外科治疗的金标准,取代了先前占据这一地位的膀胱颈悬吊技术。然而,近年来,人们对在阴道手术中使用合成材料存在担忧。
我们对文献进行了综述,以讨论膀胱颈悬吊技术在当前临床环境中的作用。
膀胱颈悬吊技术包括经阴道技术、经针悬吊技术和耻骨后技术。后两种技术已被证明对压力性尿失禁具有持久的治疗效果。与自体吊带相比,其长期成功率可能较低,但并发症发生率也较低,从而提高了患者满意度。膀胱颈悬吊技术在(失败的)吊带手术后治疗复发性和/或持续性压力性尿失禁中可能发挥作用,并且在进行例如脱垂等联合手术时,对于压力性尿失禁患者仍然具有特殊意义。