Suppr超能文献

稳定型咬合板疗法联合非咬合板多模式疗法治疗RDC/TMD轴I型患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验

Efficacy of stabilisation splint therapy combined with non-splint multimodal therapy for treating RDC/TMD axis I patients: a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Nagata K, Maruyama H, Mizuhashi R, Morita S, Hori S, Yokoe T, Sugawara Y

机构信息

Temporomandibular Disorders and Bruxism Clinic, Niigata Hospital, The Nippon Dental University, Niigata, Japan.

出版信息

J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Dec;42(12):890-9. doi: 10.1111/joor.12332. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

Abstract

Stabilisation splint therapy has long been thought to be effective for the management of temporomandibular disorders (TMD). However, the superiority of stabilisation splint therapy compared to other TMD treatments remains controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of stabilisation splint therapy combined with non-splint multimodal therapy for TMD. A total of 181 TMD participants were randomly allocated to a non-splint multimodal therapy (NS) group (n = 85) or a non-splint multimodal therapy plus stabilisation splint (NS+S) group (n = 96). Non-splint multimodal therapy included self-exercise of the jaw, cognitive-behavioural therapy, self-management education and additional jaw manipulation. Three outcome measurements were used to assess treatment efficacy: mouth-opening limitation, oro-facial pain and temporomandibular joint sounds. A two-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance (anova) was used to evaluate the efficacy of the two treatment modalities (NS vs. NS+S), and Scheffe's multiple comparison test was used to compare the treatment periods. Subgroup analyses were performed to disclose the splint effects for each TMD diagnostic group. All three parameters significantly decreased over time in both groups. However, there were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in the total comparison or subgroup analyses; an exception was the group with degenerative joint disease. No significant difference between the NS and NS+S treatment approaches was revealed in this study. Therefore, we conclude that the additional effects of stabilisation splint are not supported for patients with TMD during the application of multimodal therapy.

摘要

长期以来,稳定咬合板疗法一直被认为对颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)的治疗有效。然而,与其他TMD治疗方法相比,稳定咬合板疗法的优越性仍存在争议。本研究的目的是确定稳定咬合板疗法联合非咬合板多模式疗法治疗TMD的疗效。共有181名TMD患者被随机分配到非咬合板多模式疗法(NS)组(n = 85)或非咬合板多模式疗法加稳定咬合板(NS+S)组(n = 96)。非咬合板多模式疗法包括下颌自我运动、认知行为疗法、自我管理教育和额外的下颌手法治疗。使用三项结局指标评估治疗效果:张口受限、口面部疼痛和颞下颌关节弹响。采用双因素重复测量方差分析(anova)评估两种治疗方式(NS与NS+S)的疗效,并用谢费多重比较检验比较治疗周期。进行亚组分析以揭示每种TMD诊断组的咬合板效果。两组的所有三项参数均随时间显著下降。然而,在总体比较或亚组分析中,两个治疗组之间没有显著差异;退行性关节病组是个例外。本研究未揭示NS和NS+S治疗方法之间的显著差异。因此,我们得出结论,在多模式疗法应用期间,稳定咬合板对TMD患者没有额外效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验