Beeh Kai-Michael, LaForce Craig, Gahlemann Martina, Wenz Arne, Toorawa Robert, Fležar Matjaž
Insaf GmbH Institut für Atemwegsforschung, Biebricher Allee 34, D-65187, Wiesbaden, Germany.
North Carolina Clinical Research, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Respir Res. 2015 Jul 16;16(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12931-015-0243-1.
A Phase II, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial comparing the 24-h forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) time profile after 3 weeks' treatment with once-daily (QD) or twice-daily (BID) olodaterol (at the same total daily dose) versus placebo delivered via Respimat® in patients with moderate to severe asthma.
Patients were randomised to different sequences of olodaterol with 2-week washout, either as a total daily dose of 5 μg (5 μg QD [AM] or 2.5 μg BID) or placebo, or 10 μg (10 μg QD [AM] or 5 μg BID) or placebo. Primary end point was FEV1 area under the curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) response (defined as change from study baseline FEV1) after 3 weeks. Key secondary end points were FEV1 AUC0-12 and AUC12-24 responses.
Two hundred and six patients received treatment. All olodaterol treatments demonstrated statistically significant improvements in FEV1 AUC0-24 response at 3 weeks versus placebo (p < 0.0001); adjusted mean treatment difference versus placebo was 0.191 L for olodaterol 2.5 μg BID (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.152, 0.229), 0.150 L for 5 μg QD (95 % CI 0.111, 0.189), 0.228 L for 5 μg BID (95 % CI 0.190, 0.266) and 0.209 L for 10 μg QD (95 % CI 0.170, 0.247). These results were supported by the key secondary end points. Olodaterol 5 μg QD provided numerically lower mean values for 24-h bronchodilation than olodaterol 2.5 μg BID (p = 0.0465), with no statistically significant difference between treatment with olodaterol 10 μg QD and 5 μg BID. No relevant differences in morning and evening peak expiratory flow or Asthma Control Questionnaire scores at 3 weeks were observed between different doses and regimens. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate and comparable between groups.
All doses and dose frequencies provided adequate 24-h bronchodilation superior to placebo. Based on the results of this study, it would be reasonable to include both posologies of 5 μg olodaterol daily (5 μg QD or 2.5 μg BID, both delivered in two puffs per dose from the Respimat® inhaler) in subsequent studies. Further studies are necessary to confirm the optimum dosing regimen in asthma. No safety concerns were identified.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01311661.
一项II期、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉试验,比较中重度哮喘患者接受每日一次(QD)或每日两次(BID)奥洛他定(总日剂量相同)治疗3周后与通过Respimat®吸入安慰剂后的1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)24小时时间曲线。
患者被随机分配至不同的奥洛他定治疗序列,洗脱期为2周,总日剂量分别为5μg(5μg QD [上午]或2.5μg BID)或安慰剂,或10μg(10μg QD [上午]或5μg BID)或安慰剂。主要终点是3周后0至24小时曲线下FEV1面积(AUC0 - 24)反应(定义为相对于研究基线FEV1的变化)。关键次要终点是FEV1 AUC0 - 12和AUC12 - 24反应。
206例患者接受了治疗。与安慰剂相比,所有奥洛他定治疗在3周时FEV1 AUC0 - 24反应均有统计学显著改善(p < 0.0001);与安慰剂相比,调整后的平均治疗差异为:奥洛他定2.5μg BID为0.191L(95%置信区间[CI] 0.152,0.229),5μg QD为0.150L(95% CI 0.111,0.189),5μg BID为0.228L(95% CI ),10μg QD为0.209L(95% CI 0.170,0.247)。这些结果得到了关键次要终点的支持。奥洛他定5μg QD的24小时支气管扩张平均值在数值上低于奥洛他定2.5μg BID(p = 0.0465),奥洛他定10μg QD与5μg BID治疗之间无统计学显著差异。在3周时,不同剂量和给药方案之间在早晚呼气峰值流速或哮喘控制问卷评分方面未观察到相关差异。不良事件一般为轻度至中度,组间相当。
所有剂量和给药频率均提供了优于安慰剂的充分24小时支气管扩张。基于本研究结果,在后续研究中纳入每日5μg奥洛他定的两种给药方案(5μg QD或2.5μg BID,均通过Respimat®吸入器每剂量分两次喷雾给药)是合理的。需要进一步研究以确认哮喘的最佳给药方案。未发现安全问题。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01311661