Szynglarewicz Bartlomiej, Kasprzak Piotr, Halon Agnieszka, Matkowski Rafal
Department of Surgical Oncology, Lower Silesian Oncology Centre, Plac Hirszfelda 12, 53-413, Wroclaw, Poland.
Department of Breast Imaging, Lower Silesian Oncology Centre, Wroclaw, Poland.
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul 16;13:218. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0641-3.
BACKGROUND: In ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS), histologic diagnosis obtained before the definitive treatment is related to the risk of underestimation if the presence of invasive cancer is found postoperatively. These patients need a second operation to assess the nodal status. We evaluated the upstaging rate in patients with mass-forming DCIS. METHODS: Sixty-three women with pure DCIS presenting as sonographic mass lesion underwent vacuum-assisted or core-needle biopsy and subsequent surgery. Rates of postoperative upstaging to invasive cancer were calculated and compared with clinical character and size of DCIS. RESULTS: Median age of patients (range) was 63 years (27-88) while median diameter of DCIS was 11 mm (6-60). Fifty-six percent of DCIS were upstaged. Patient age did not differ significantly between groups with and without final invasion (median, mean, SD): 63, 61.4, 12.5 vs 62, 61.2, 10.6 years, respectively (P=0.659). The difference of DCIS size between these groups was statistically important (median, mean, SD): 13, 17.3, 11.4 vs 9.5, 9.8, 3.2 mm, respectively (P=0.0003). Mass size and palpability were significant risk factors (P<0.001 and P<0.01, respectively). Rate of underestimation for mass with diameter≤10 mm, 10-20 mm and >20 mm was 37, 64 and 91%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DCIS diagnosed on minimal-invasive biopsy of even small sonographic mass is of high risk for the upstaging to invasive cancer after final surgical excision. In these patients, subsequent intervention is needed for nodal status assessment. They are good candidates for the sentinel node biopsy during the breast operation to avoid multi-step surgery.
背景:在乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)中,在 definitive 治疗前获得的组织学诊断与术后发现浸润性癌时低估风险相关。这些患者需要二次手术来评估淋巴结状态。我们评估了形成肿块型 DCIS 患者的分期上调率。 方法:63 例表现为超声肿块病变的纯 DCIS 女性患者接受了真空辅助或粗针活检及随后的手术。计算术后上调至浸润性癌的发生率,并与 DCIS 的临床特征和大小进行比较。 结果:患者的中位年龄(范围)为 63 岁(27 - 88 岁),而 DCIS 的中位直径为 11 毫米(6 - 60 毫米)。56%的 DCIS 出现分期上调。有最终浸润和无最终浸润组的患者年龄无显著差异(中位数、均值、标准差):分别为 63、61.4、12.5 岁和 62、61.2、10.6 岁(P = 0.659)。这些组之间 DCIS 大小的差异具有统计学意义(中位数、均值、标准差):分别为 13、17.3、11.4 毫米和 9.5、9.8、3.2 毫米(P = 0.0003)。肿块大小和可触及性是显著的危险因素(分别为 P < 0.001 和 P < 0.01)。直径≤10 毫米、10 - 20 毫米和>20 毫米的肿块低估率分别为 37%、64%和 91%。 结论:即使是小的超声肿块经微创活检诊断为 DCIS,在最终手术切除后上调至浸润性癌的风险也很高。对于这些患者,需要后续干预来评估淋巴结状态。他们是乳房手术中前哨淋巴结活检的良好候选者,以避免多步骤手术。
World J Surg Oncol. 2016-3-9
Breast J. 2011-11-23
World J Surg Oncol. 2010-9-8