Suppr超能文献

在固定蒸发器设置下,地氟烷和七氟烷用于低流量和极低流量麻醉。

Desflurane and sevoflurane use during low- and minimal-flow anesthesia at fixed vaporizer settings.

作者信息

Horwitz Maria, Jakobsson Jan G

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Institution for Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyds, University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden -

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Feb;82(2):180-5. Epub 2015 Jul 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The pharmacokinetics for sevoflurane and desflurane makes them suitable for low-flow anesthesia. The aim of the present study was to assess the use of desflurane and sevoflurane at constant vaporizer settings and fixed low fresh gas flows.

METHODS

One hundred ASA 1-2 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery were randomized into 4 groups (25 patients each): a fixed fresh gas flow 1.0 or 0.5 L/min with desflurane (D1.0 and D0.5) or sevoflurane (S1.0 and S0.5) throughout anesthesia. A fixed vaporizer setting, sevoflurane 6% and desflurane 18% was used during wash-in. Time to reach 1 and 1.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC), emergence and gas consumption from start to end of surgery was studied.

RESULTS

Time to reach 1 MAC age adjusted desflurane or sevoflurane was D0.5 8.5±1.7, D1.0 3.7±0.7, S0.5 15.2±2.4 and S1.0 6.2±1.3 minutes, respectively (P<0.001), and times to increase from 1 to 1.5 MAC differed also significantly. Desflurane anesthesia was associated to significantly shorter time to extubation 6.7±2.3 vs. 10±2.3 minutes for sevoflurane (P<0.001). The amount of agent consumed g/min. was significantly reduced for both 0.5 L/min groups: 30% less for desflurane and 19% for sevoflurane.

CONCLUSIONS

We found an almost twice as rapid wash-in with desflurane and expectedly faster emergence. Gas consumption was lower at 0.5 L/min than it was at 1 L/min for both gases studied however most pronounced for desflurane. Desflurane has clear advantages for minimal fresh gas flow anesthesia.

摘要

背景

七氟烷和地氟烷的药代动力学特性使其适用于低流量麻醉。本研究的目的是评估在恒定蒸发器设置和固定低新鲜气体流量下使用地氟烷和七氟烷的情况。

方法

100例接受择期腹腔镜手术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)1-2级患者被随机分为4组(每组25例):在整个麻醉过程中,分别使用地氟烷(D1.0和D0.5)或七氟烷(S1.0和S0.5),新鲜气体流量固定为1.0或0.5L/min。诱导期使用固定的蒸发器设置,七氟烷为6%,地氟烷为18%。研究达到1和1.5倍最低肺泡浓度(MAC)的时间、苏醒时间以及手术开始至结束时的气体消耗量。

结果

达到1倍MAC年龄校正后的地氟烷或七氟烷的时间,D0.5组为8.5±1.7分钟,D1.0组为3.7±0.7分钟,S0.5组为15.2±2.4分钟,S1.0组为6.2±1.3分钟(P<0.001),从1倍MAC增加到1.5倍MAC的时间也有显著差异。地氟烷麻醉组的拔管时间明显更短,地氟烷组为6.7±2.3分钟,七氟烷组为10±2.3分钟(P<0.001)。两个0.5L/min组的药物消耗量(g/min)均显著降低:地氟烷降低30%,七氟烷降低19%。

结论

我们发现地氟烷的诱导速度几乎快两倍,且预期苏醒更快。对于所研究的两种气体,0.5L/min时的气体消耗量均低于1L/min,但地氟烷最为明显。地氟烷在最低新鲜气体流量麻醉方面具有明显优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验