Ayres Karen L, Spottswood Stephanie E, Delbeke Dominique, Price Ronald, Hodges Pamela K, Wang Li, Martin William H
Department of Radiology and Radiologic Sciences, Vanderbilt Children's Hospital/Vanderbilt University Hospital, Nashville, Tennessee
Department of Radiology and Radiologic Sciences, Vanderbilt Children's Hospital/Vanderbilt University Hospital, Nashville, Tennessee.
J Nucl Med. 2015 Sep;56(9):1391-4. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.156141. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
The 2010 North American Consensus Guidelines (NACG) for pediatric administered doses and the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) Dosage Card guidelines recommend lower activities than those administered at our institution. We compared the quality of the lower-activity images with the higher-activity images to determine whether the reduction in counts affects overall image quality.
Twenty patients presenting to our pediatric radiology department for bone scintigraphy were evaluated. Their mean weight was 20 kg. The patients were referred for oncologic (n = 10), infectious/inflammatory (n = 5), and pain (n = 5) evaluation. Dynamic anterior and posterior images were acquired for 5 min for each patient. Data were subsampled to represent different administered activities corresponding to the activities recommended by the NACG and the EANM Dosage Card. Images were evaluated twice, first for diagnostic quality and then for acceptability for daily clinical use.
There was no statistically significant difference in the diagnostic quality of the images from any of the 3 protocols. Pathologic uptake was correctly identified independent of the administered activity, although there was a single false-positive result for an EANM image. When images were subjectively evaluated as acceptable for daily clinical use, there was a slight preference for the higher-activity images over the NACG (P = 0.04).
The recommended administered activities of the NACG produce images of diagnostic quality while reducing patient radiation exposure.
2010年北美儿科给药剂量共识指南(NACG)以及欧洲核医学协会(EANM)剂量卡指南推荐的活性低于我们机构所给予的活性。我们比较了低活性图像与高活性图像的质量,以确定计数减少是否会影响整体图像质量。
对20名到我们儿科放射科进行骨闪烁显像的患者进行评估。他们的平均体重为20千克。这些患者因肿瘤(n = 10)、感染/炎症(n = 5)和疼痛(n = 5)评估而前来就诊。为每位患者采集动态前后位图像5分钟。对数据进行二次采样,以代表与NACG和EANM剂量卡推荐的活性相对应的不同给药活性。对图像进行两次评估,首先评估诊断质量,然后评估日常临床使用的可接受性。
三种方案中任何一种方案的图像诊断质量均无统计学显著差异。尽管EANM图像有一个假阳性结果,但病理摄取的识别与给药活性无关。当主观评估图像可用于日常临床使用时,与NACG相比,对高活性图像略有偏好(P = 0.04)。
NACG推荐的给药活性可产生具有诊断质量的图像,同时减少患者的辐射暴露。