University of Ulm, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy III, Leimgrubenweg 12-14, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
University of Ulm, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy III, Leimgrubenweg 12-14, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Sep 30;229(1-2):257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.07.024. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
Inhibition of serotonin uptake in platelets seems to be the crucial mechanism underlying SSRI-associated haemorrhages. This effect is also present in antidepressants featuring non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibition (non-SSRI). Impact of selectivity of serotonin reuptake and/or affinity to the serotonin reuptake transporter on the bleeding risk have not yet been studied sufficiently. We retrieved country- and SSRI-/non-SSRI-specific data from the Uppsala Monitoring Centre and used a case/non-case approach to calculate substance-specific reporting odds ratios (ROR) to evaluate the statistical association of treatment with SSRI/non-SSRI and haemorrhages. Country-specific analysis revealed no clear trends towards an increased risk of bleeding related to particular agents of group SSRI/non-SSRI (sporadically ROR>1 for citalopram, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, St. John's wort). There was a clear trend in the total dataset towards a "reduced protective effect" (suggested by ROR<1) on the development of haemorrhages with agents featuring comparatively high affinity to the 5-HTT and/or selective serotonin reuptake inhibition (as with escitalopram, citalopram, duloxetine or venlafaxine) in comparison to agents with lower affinity or non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibition (as with mirtazapine or doxepin). Comparison of group-specific aggregated data (SSRI vs. non-SSRI) revealed significant differences regarding the "protective effect" on the development of haemorrhages between groups SSRI vs. non-SSRI in favour of non-SSRI in nearly all countries as well as in the total dataset. Our findings provide preliminary evidence that agents with increased affinity to the 5-HTT and/or selective serotonin reuptake inhibition may be associated with an increased risk of bleeding.
血小板中 5-羟色胺摄取的抑制似乎是 SSRI 相关出血的关键机制。这种作用也存在于具有非选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制(非-SSRIs)的抗抑郁药中。5-羟色胺再摄取的选择性和/或对 5-羟色胺再摄取转运体的亲和力对出血风险的影响尚未得到充分研究。我们从 Uppsala 监测中心检索了国家和 SSRI/非-SSRIs 特异性数据,并使用病例/非病例方法计算了特定物质的报告比值比(ROR),以评估治疗与 SSRI/非-SSRIs 和出血之间的统计学关联。国家特异性分析显示,与特定 SSRI/非-SSRIs 药物(偶尔对于西酞普兰、度洛西汀、依他普仑、氟伏沙明、帕罗西汀、舍曲林、圣约翰草)的出血风险增加没有明显趋势。在总数据集上,有一个明显的趋势是,具有相对较高亲和力的药物(如依他普仑、西酞普兰、度洛西汀或文拉法辛)在出血的发展方面具有“保护作用降低”(由 ROR<1 提示),而具有较低亲和力或非选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制的药物(如米氮平和多塞平)则没有。对组特异性汇总数据(SSRIs 与非-SSRIs)进行比较,发现 SSRI 组与非-SSRIs 组在出血发生方面的“保护作用”存在显著差异,在几乎所有国家以及总数据集上,非-SSRIs 组都具有显著优势。我们的研究结果初步表明,与 5-羟色胺转运体亲和力增加和/或选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制相关的药物可能与出血风险增加相关。