Schonberger Robert B, Dai Feng, Brandt Cynthia A, Burg Matthew M
From the Department of Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut; VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut; Departments of Emergency Medicine and Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; and Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Anesth Analg. 2015 Sep;121(3):632-641. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000860.
Because of uncertainty regarding the reliability of perioperative blood pressures and traditional notions downplaying the role of anesthesiologists in longitudinal patient care, there is no consensus for anesthesiologists to recommend postoperative primary care blood pressure follow-up for patients presenting for surgery with an increased blood pressure. The decision of whom to refer should ideally be based on a predictive model that balances performance with ease-of-use. If an acceptable decision rule was developed, a new practice paradigm integrating the surgical encounter into broader public health efforts could be tested, with the goal of reducing long-term morbidity from hypertension among surgical patients.
Using national data from US veterans receiving surgical care, we determined the prevalence of poorly controlled outpatient clinic blood pressures ≥140/90 mm Hg, based on the mean of up to 4 readings in the year after surgery. Four increasingly complex logistic regression models were assessed to predict this outcome. The first included the mean of 2 preoperative blood pressure readings; other models progressively added a broad array of demographic and clinical data. After internal validation, the C-statistics and the Net Reclassification Index between the simplest and most complex models were assessed. The performance characteristics of several simple blood pressure referral thresholds were then calculated.
Among 215,621 patients, poorly controlled outpatient clinic blood pressure was present postoperatively in 25.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.5%-25.9%) including 14.2% (95% CI, 13.9%-14.6%) of patients lacking a hypertension history. The most complex prediction model demonstrated statistically significant, but clinically marginal, improvement in discrimination over a model based on preoperative blood pressure alone (C-statistic, 0.736 [95% CI, 0.734-0.739] vs 0.721 [95% CI, 0.718-0.723]; P for difference <0.0001). The Net Reclassification Index was 0.088 (95% CI, 0.082-0.093); P < 0.0001. A preoperative blood pressure threshold ≥150/95 mm Hg, calculated as the mean of 2 readings, identified patients more likely than not to demonstrate outpatient clinic blood pressures in the hypertensive range. Four of 5 patients not meeting this criterion were indeed found to be normotensive during outpatient clinic follow-up (positive predictive value, 51.5%; 95% CI, 51.0-52.0; negative predictive value, 79.6%; 95% CI, 79.4-79.7).
In a national cohort of surgical patients, poorly controlled postoperative clinic blood pressure was present in >1 of 4 patients (95% CI, 25.5%-25.9%). Predictive modeling based on the mean of 2 preoperative blood pressure measurements performed nearly as well as more complicated models and may provide acceptable predictive performance to guide postoperative referral decisions. Future studies of the feasibility and efficacy of such referrals are needed to assess possible beneficial effects on long-term cardiovascular morbidity.
由于围手术期血压的可靠性存在不确定性,以及传统观念淡化了麻醉医生在患者长期护理中的作用,对于麻醉医生是否应为血压升高的手术患者推荐术后初级保健血压随访,目前尚无共识。理想情况下,转诊对象的决定应基于一个在性能和易用性之间取得平衡的预测模型。如果能开发出一个可接受的决策规则,就可以测试一种将手术诊疗纳入更广泛公共卫生工作的新实践模式,目标是降低手术患者高血压的长期发病率。
利用美国接受手术治疗退伍军人的全国性数据,我们根据术后一年多达4次读数的平均值,确定门诊诊所血压控制不佳(≥140/90 mmHg)的患病率。评估了四个日益复杂的逻辑回归模型来预测这一结果。第一个模型包括术前两次血压读数的平均值;其他模型逐步增加了一系列人口统计学和临床数据。经过内部验证后,评估了最简单和最复杂模型之间的C统计量和净重新分类指数。然后计算了几个简单血压转诊阈值的性能特征。
在215,621名患者中,术后门诊诊所血压控制不佳的比例为25.7%(95%置信区间[CI],25.5%-25.9%),其中无高血压病史的患者占14.2%(95%CI,13.9%-14.6%)。最复杂的预测模型与仅基于术前血压的模型相比,在辨别能力上有统计学意义但临床意义不大的改善(C统计量,0.736[95%CI,0.734-0.739]对0.721[95%CI,0.718-0.723];差异P<0.0001)。净重新分类指数为0.088(95%CI,0.082-0.093);P<0.0001。术前血压阈值≥150/95 mmHg(计算为两次读数的平均值)可识别出门诊诊所血压更有可能不在高血压范围内的患者。在门诊随访中,5名未达到该标准的患者中有4名确实血压正常(阳性预测值,51.5%;95%CI,51.0-52.0;阴性预测值,79.6%;95%CI,79.4-79.7)。
在全国手术患者队列中,超过四分之一的患者术后门诊诊所血压控制不佳(95%CI,25.5%-25.9%)。基于术前两次血压测量平均值的预测模型表现与更复杂的模型相近,可能提供可接受的预测性能以指导术后转诊决策。需要对这种转诊的可行性和有效性进行未来研究,以评估对长期心血管发病率可能的有益影响。