Barzegar Mohammadreza, Asadi-Kani Zahra, Mozafari Nikoo, Vahidnezhad Hassan, Kariminejad Ariana, Toossi Parviz
Skin Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Molecular Medicine Department, Biotechnology Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Int J Dermatol. 2015 Oct;54(10):e416-23. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12804. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
Immunofluorescence antigen mapping (IFM), is a newly introduced technique for diagnosis and classification of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) disease. The precise level of skin cleavage can be determined using monoclonal antibodies to EB-specific basement membrane zone protein.
To apply IFM technique in diagnosis and classification of EB and to identify utility and limitation of this method in our clinical setting.
IFM was done according to a described protocol by Pohla-Gubo et al. Monoclonal antibodies used for antigen mapping were against cytokeratin 5, cytokeratin 14, α6 integrin, β4 integrin, laminin 332, Collagen IV, and Collagen VII.
IFM was done for 95 referred patients, compromising 49 females and 46 males, aged 5 days to 45 years (mean = 9.5 years). Ninety cases were diagnosed with EB and classified as follows: EB simplex: (n = 13), junctional EB (n = 14), dystrophic EB (n = 62), and Kindler syndrome (n = 1). Diagnosis was not made in five cases as their specimens contained no blister. Confirmatory genetic analysis was done for five junctional cases from two families with clinical features of laryngo-onycho-cutaneous syndrome. Genetic molecular studies showed nonsense mutations in the last codon of exon 39 of the laminin α3a (LAMA3) gene (p.Gln57X) and a donor splice site mutation in LAMA3 (IVS57+5G>A) in the first and second family, respectively.
IFM technique is relatively simple to perform, and interpretation of the results is not sophisticated. The proportion of inconclusive results will be decreased if the specimens contain freshly induced blister.
免疫荧光抗原定位(IFM)是一种新引入的用于大疱性表皮松解症(EB)疾病诊断和分类的技术。使用针对EB特异性基底膜区蛋白的单克隆抗体可确定皮肤裂开的精确水平。
将IFM技术应用于EB的诊断和分类,并确定该方法在我们临床环境中的实用性和局限性。
IFM按照Pohla-Gubo等人描述的方案进行。用于抗原定位的单克隆抗体针对细胞角蛋白5、细胞角蛋白14、α6整合素、β4整合素、层粘连蛋白332、胶原蛋白IV和胶原蛋白VII。
对95例转诊患者进行了IFM,其中包括49名女性和46名男性,年龄从5天至45岁(平均=9.5岁)。90例被诊断为EB并分类如下:单纯性EB(n = 13)、交界性EB(n = 14)、营养不良性EB(n = 62)和Kindler综合征(n = 1)。5例未作出诊断,因为其标本中没有水疱。对来自两个具有喉-甲-皮肤综合征临床特征的家庭的5例交界性病例进行了验证性基因分析。基因分子研究显示,第一个家庭中,层粘连蛋白α3a(LAMA3)基因第39外显子的最后一个密码子发生无义突变(p.Gln57X);第二个家庭中,LAMA3基因发生供体剪接位点突变(IVS57+5G>A)。
IFM技术操作相对简单,结果解释不复杂。如果标本中含有新诱导的水疱,不确定结果的比例将会降低。