Stockton David J, Lefaivre Kelly A, Deakin Daniel E, Osterhoff Georg, Yamada Andrew, Broekhuyse Henry M, OʼBrien Peter J, Slobogean Gerard P
*Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedics, Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; †Consultant Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeon, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom; and ‡Vancouver-Fraser Medical Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver British Columbia, Canada.
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Sep;29(9):e293-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000351.
To describe the incidence and magnitude of femoral neck fracture shortening in patients age younger than 60 years. Secondarily, to examine predictors of fracture shortening.
Retrospective chart review.
Level I trauma centre.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-five patients with a median age of 51 years (interquartile range: 42-56 years) were included. Seventy-one percent were male, 75% were displaced fractures, and 78% were treated with cancellous screws.
Internal fixation with multiple cancellous screws or sliding hip screw (SHS) + derotation screw.
Radiographic femoral neck shortening at a minimum of 6 weeks after fixation.
Fifty-four percent of patients had ≥5 mm of femoral neck shortening (22% had between ≥5 and <10 mm and 32% ≥10 mm). Initially, displaced fractures shortened more than undisplaced fractures (mean: 8.1 vs. 2.2 mm, P < 0.001), and fractures treated with SHS + derotation screw shortened more than fractures with cancellous screws alone (10.7 vs. 5.5 mm, P = 0.03). Even when adjusting for initial fracture displacement, fractures treated with SHS + derotation screw shortened an average of 2.2 mm more than fractures treated with screws alone (P = 0.03).
The incidence of clinically significant shortening in our young femoral neck fracture population was higher than anticipated, and 32% of patients experienced severe shortening of >1 cm. Our findings highlight the need for further research to determine the impact of severe shortening on functional outcome and to determine if implant selection affects fracture shortening.
Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
描述60岁以下患者股骨颈骨折缩短的发生率及程度。其次,研究骨折缩短的预测因素。
回顾性病历审查。
一级创伤中心。
患者/参与者:纳入65例患者,中位年龄51岁(四分位间距:42 - 56岁)。71%为男性,75%为移位骨折,78%接受松质骨螺钉治疗。
采用多根松质骨螺钉或滑动髋螺钉(SHS)+ 旋转螺钉进行内固定。
固定后至少6周时股骨颈的影像学缩短情况。
54%的患者股骨颈缩短≥5 mm(22%为≥5至<10 mm,32%≥10 mm)。最初,移位骨折比未移位骨折缩短更明显(平均:8.1 vs. 2.2 mm,P < 0.001),且采用SHS + 旋转螺钉治疗的骨折比单纯使用松质骨螺钉治疗的骨折缩短更明显(10.7 vs. 5.5 mm,P = 0.03)。即使在调整初始骨折移位后,采用SHS + 旋转螺钉治疗的骨折比单纯使用螺钉治疗的骨折平均多缩短2.2 mm(P = 0.03)。
在我们的年轻股骨颈骨折人群中,具有临床意义的缩短发生率高于预期,32%的患者出现了>1 cm的严重缩短。我们的研究结果强调需要进一步研究以确定严重缩短对功能结局的影响,并确定植入物的选择是否会影响骨折缩短。
预后IV级。有关证据级别的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。