Celikten Berkan, Uzuntas Ceren Feriha, Orhan Ayse Isıl, Orhan Kaan, Tufenkci Pelin, Kursun Sebnem, Demiralp Kemal Özgür
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ministry of Health, Ataturk Oral and Dental Health Care Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Scanning. 2016 Mar-Apr;38(2):133-40. doi: 10.1002/sca.21249. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the presence of voids in oval root canals filled with different root canal sealers (EndoSequence BC Sealer, Smartpaste bio, ActiV GP) and to compare those with root canals filled with AH Plus sealer using micro-CT. In total, 40 freshly extracted human single-root maxillary premolars were used. Specimens instrumented with the EndoSequence NiTi rotary instrument were assigned randomly into four groups. In each group, root canals were filled with single-cone gutta-percha and one of the tested sealers. Each specimen was then scanned using micro-CT at a voxel resolution of 13.47 μm. Proportions of sections with voids in cross-sectional images and void volumes for each sealer were calculated in the apical, middle, and coronal thirds. Differences according to root canal sealers were evaluated statistically using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U-test at a significance level of 5%. The analysis showed a decrease in void formation in the apical third, with a significant difference between the apical and coronal thirds among bioceramic sealers, ActiV GP, and AH Plus (p < 0.05) but no significant difference between the apical and middle thirds or between the middle and coronal thirds was found for the sealers tested (p > 0.05). All root canal sealers tested resulted in voids. The bioceramic sealers (EndoSequence BC Sealer, Smartpaste bio) produced similar voids which had the fewest in the apical third of root canals among the sealers tested which can be related due to root canal anatomy variations.
本研究的目的是评估和比较用不同根管封闭剂(EndoSequence BC封闭剂、Smartpaste bio、ActiV GP)充填的椭圆形根管中孔隙的存在情况,并使用显微CT将其与用AH Plus封闭剂充填的根管进行比较。总共使用了40颗新鲜拔除的人类单根上颌前磨牙。用EndoSequence镍钛旋转器械预备的标本被随机分为四组。每组根管均用单锥牙胶和一种受试封闭剂充填。然后使用显微CT以13.47μm的体素分辨率对每个标本进行扫描。计算根尖、根管中部和冠部三分之一处横断面图像中存在孔隙的切片比例以及每种封闭剂的孔隙体积。根据根管封闭剂的差异,使用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计学评估,显著性水平为5%。分析表明,根尖三分之一处孔隙形成减少,生物陶瓷封闭剂、ActiV GP和AH Plus在根尖和冠部三分之一之间存在显著差异(p<0.05),但受试封闭剂在根尖和根管中部三分之一之间或中部和冠部三分之一之间未发现显著差异(p>0.05)。所有受试根管封闭剂均导致孔隙形成。生物陶瓷封闭剂(EndoSequence BC封闭剂、Smartpaste bio)产生的孔隙相似,在所测试的封闭剂中,其在根管根尖三分之一处的孔隙最少,这可能与根管解剖结构变异有关。