• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Distinguishing Bereavement from Depression in DSM-5: Evidence from Longitudinal Epidemiologic Surveys.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中区分丧亲之痛与抑郁症:来自纵向流行病学调查的证据
Psychiatr Ann. 2013 Jun;43(6):276-282. doi: 10.3928/00485713-20130605-08.
2
Bereavement-related depressive episodes: characteristics, 3-year course, and implications for the DSM-5.与丧亲相关的抑郁发作:特征、3年病程及对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版的意义
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;68(9):920-8. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.95.
3
Is DSM-IV bereavement exclusion for major depression relevant to treatment response? A case-control, prospective study.DSM-IV 对重度抑郁症丧亲之痛的排除是否与治疗反应相关?一项病例对照、前瞻性研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;72(7):898-902. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05681blu. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
4
Is DSM-IV bereavement exclusion for major depressive episode relevant to severity and pattern of symptoms? A case-control, cross-sectional study.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中关于排除丧亲之痛所致的重度抑郁发作,这与症状的严重程度和模式有关吗?一项病例对照横断面研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;70(8):1091-7. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04475. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
5
Did narrowing the major depression bereavement exclusion from DSM-III-R to DSM-IV increase validity?: evidence from the National Comorbidity Survey.将重度抑郁的丧亲排除标准从《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版(DSM-III-R)缩小到《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)是否提高了有效性?来自全国共病调查的证据。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011 Feb;199(2):66-73. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31820840c5.
6
Recurrence of depression after bereavement-related depression: evidence for the validity of DSM-IV bereavement exclusion from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study.居丧相关抑郁后抑郁症的复发:来自流行病学集水区研究的关于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版居丧排除标准有效性的证据
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012 Jun;200(6):480-5. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318248213f.
7
Extending the bereavement exclusion for major depression to other losses: evidence from the National Comorbidity Survey.将重度抑郁症的丧亲排除期扩展至其他损失:来自全国共病调查的证据。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;64(4):433-40. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.4.433.
8
The bereavement exclusion and DSM-5.丧亲之痛排除和 DSM-5。
Depress Anxiety. 2012 May;29(5):425-43. doi: 10.1002/da.21927. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
9
DSM bereavement exclusion for major depression and objective cognitive impairment.DSM 对重度抑郁症和客观认知障碍的丧亲排除。
J Affect Disord. 2011 Apr;130(1-2):113-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.10.031. Epub 2010 Nov 6.
10
Does bereavement-related major depression differ from major depression associated with other stressful life events?与丧亲相关的重度抑郁症与与其他应激性生活事件相关的重度抑郁症有区别吗?
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;165(11):1449-55. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07111757. Epub 2008 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
No time to grieve: Inuit loss experiences and grief practices in Nunavik, Quebec.无暇悲伤:魁北克努纳武特因纽特人的丧失经历与悲伤实践
Transcult Psychiatry. 2023 Dec;60(6):917-928. doi: 10.1177/13634615221135423. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
2
The removal of the bereavement exclusion in the DSM-5: exploring the evidence.DSM-5 中丧亲排除的去除:探索证据。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013 Nov;15(11):413. doi: 10.1007/s11920-013-0413-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Complicated grief #254.复杂性哀伤#254。
J Palliat Med. 2012 Jul;15(7):829-30. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.9577.
2
Normal vs. disordered bereavement-related depression: are the differences real or tautological?正常与紊乱丧亲相关抑郁:差异是真实的还是同义反复?
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2013 Feb;127(2):159-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2012.01898.x. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
3
Recurrence of depression after bereavement-related depression: evidence for the validity of DSM-IV bereavement exclusion from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study.居丧相关抑郁后抑郁症的复发:来自流行病学集水区研究的关于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版居丧排除标准有效性的证据
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012 Jun;200(6):480-5. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318248213f.
4
The bereavement exclusion and DSM-5.丧亲之痛排除和 DSM-5。
Depress Anxiety. 2012 May;29(5):425-43. doi: 10.1002/da.21927. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
5
Culture, bereavement, and psychiatry.文化、丧亲之痛与精神病学。
Lancet. 2012 Feb 18;379(9816):608-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60258-x.
6
Validity of the bereavement exclusion to major depression: does the empirical evidence support the proposal to eliminate the exclusion in DSM-5?丧亲之痛排除对重度抑郁症的有效性:实证证据是否支持在 DSM-5 中删除该排除?
World Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;11(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.01.002.
7
Bereavement and the diagnosis of major depressive episode in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.丧亲与重性抑郁发作的诊断:来自国家酒精相关情况和流行病学调查。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;73(2):208-15. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06080. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
8
Bereavement-related depressive episodes: characteristics, 3-year course, and implications for the DSM-5.与丧亲相关的抑郁发作:特征、3年病程及对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版的意义
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;68(9):920-8. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.95.
9
Should uncomplicated bereavement-related depression be reclassified as a disorder in the DSM-5? Response to Kenneth S. Kendler's statement defending the proposal to eliminate the bereavement exclusion.单纯的丧亲相关抑郁是否应在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中重新归类为一种疾病?对肯尼斯·S·肯德勒为消除丧亲排除条款提议进行辩护的声明的回应。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011 Mar;199(3):203-8. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31820cd155.
10
Is DSM-IV bereavement exclusion for major depression relevant to treatment response? A case-control, prospective study.DSM-IV 对重度抑郁症丧亲之痛的排除是否与治疗反应相关?一项病例对照、前瞻性研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;72(7):898-902. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05681blu. Epub 2010 Nov 2.

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中区分丧亲之痛与抑郁症:来自纵向流行病学调查的证据

Distinguishing Bereavement from Depression in DSM-5: Evidence from Longitudinal Epidemiologic Surveys.

作者信息

Paksarian Diana, Mojtabai Ramin

机构信息

Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Ann. 2013 Jun;43(6):276-282. doi: 10.3928/00485713-20130605-08.

DOI:10.3928/00485713-20130605-08
PMID:26229212
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4517840/
Abstract

Following the earlier versions of the diagnostic manual, the DSM-IV set a higher symptom and duration threshold for the diagnosis of major depression in individuals who have experienced recent bereavement-the bereavement exclusion criterion. This criterion excludes a diagnosis of major depression among those whose symptoms persist for less than two months, as long as they do not have marked functional impairment, morbid preoccupation with worthlessness, suicidal ideation, psychotic symptoms, or psychomotor retardation. The DSM-5 committee, however, has proposed to remove this criterion from the upcoming DSM-5. The committee's decision was based on reviews of past literature. However, few past studies directly compared DSM-excluded bereavement-related depression to other major depressive disorder in representative population samples and had adequate power to detect differences. The results of these studies, therefore, did not provide strong evidence for the validity of bereavement exclusion. In this paper, we review three recently published analyses based on large epidemiologic samples that found significant differences between those with bereavement-excluded episodes and episodes meeting major depression criteria with regard to short-term risk of future depressive episodes, psychiatric comorbidity and other clinical and socio-demographic characteristics. In follow-ups ranging from 1 to 3 years, individuals with bereavement-excluded depressive episodes were significantly less likely to experience new episodes than those who met criteria for depression, and were not more likely to experience future episodes than those without any past history of depression. The findings from these new studies support the validity of the DSM-IV bereavement exclusion criterion and argue for preserving it in the new edition of the manual.

摘要

继早期版本的诊断手册之后,《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)对近期经历丧亲之痛的个体诊断重度抑郁症设定了更高的症状和持续时间阈值——即丧亲排除标准。该标准排除了对那些症状持续时间少于两个月的个体的重度抑郁症诊断,只要他们没有明显的功能损害、对无价值感的病态执着、自杀观念、精神病性症状或精神运动迟缓。然而,《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第五版》(DSM-5)委员会提议在即将出版的DSM-5中删除这一标准。该委员会的决定基于对以往文献的回顾。然而,过去很少有研究在具有代表性的人群样本中直接将DSM排除的与丧亲相关的抑郁症与其他重度抑郁症进行比较,并且没有足够的效力来检测差异。因此,这些研究结果并未为丧亲排除的有效性提供有力证据。在本文中,我们回顾了三项最近基于大型流行病学样本发表的分析,这些分析发现,在未来抑郁发作的短期风险、精神疾病共病以及其他临床和社会人口学特征方面,经历丧亲排除发作的个体与符合重度抑郁症标准的发作个体之间存在显著差异。在为期1至3年的随访中,经历丧亲排除抑郁发作的个体比符合抑郁症标准的个体经历新发作的可能性显著更低,并且与没有任何抑郁症病史的个体相比,他们经历未来发作的可能性也并不更高。这些新研究的结果支持了DSM-IV丧亲排除标准的有效性,并主张在手册的新版本中保留该标准。