Suppr超能文献

长期留置的TRAPEASE和OPTEASE下腔静脉滤器的取出

Retrieval of TRAPEASE and OPTEASE Inferior Vena Cava Filters with Extended Dwell Times.

作者信息

Scher Daniel, Venbrux Anthony, Okapal Kevin, Gabriel Gaby, Dufour Robert, Chun Albert, Sarin Shawn, Akman Andrew

机构信息

Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, George Washington University Hospital, 900 23rd St. NW, Washington, DC 20037.

Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, George Washington University Hospital, 900 23rd St. NW, Washington, DC 20037..

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Oct;26(10):1519-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To demonstrate that OPTEASE and TRAPEASE filters can be removed after dwell times greater than 60 days.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent an attempted removal of a TRAPEASE or OPTEASE filter with a greater than 60-day dwell time between 2009 and 2015 at a single institution. Eleven patients within that time span were identified, and 10 were included in the review. One patient was excluded from the study because the date of filter placement was unknown.

RESULTS

All filters were successfully retrieved. The average dwell time for removed TRAPEASE filters was 1,273 days (range, 129-3,582 d), with a median of 492 days (n = 5). The average dwell time for OPTEASE filters was 977 days (range, 123-2,584 d), with a median of 661 days (n = 5). The average dwell time of all filters was 1,125 days (range, 123-3,582 d), with a median of 577 days (n = 10). All patients exhibited inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis after filter retrieval. An IVC pseudoaneurysm was present following retrieval in one case and resolved. In one case, a fractured filter strut was left completely embedded in the caval wall. Two patients reported unilateral leg swelling on clinical follow-up, and the remainder reported no leg swelling or tightness.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial experience suggests that TRAPEASE and OPTEASE filters can be removed after extended dwell times.

摘要

目的

证明OPTEASE和TRAPEASE滤器在留置时间超过60天后可以取出。

材料与方法

对2009年至2015年期间在一家机构尝试取出留置时间超过60天的TRAPEASE或OPTEASE滤器的患者进行回顾性研究。在该时间段内确定了11例患者,其中10例纳入研究。1例患者因滤器植入日期不明被排除在研究之外。

结果

所有滤器均成功取出。取出的TRAPEASE滤器平均留置时间为1273天(范围129 - 3582天),中位数为492天(n = 5)。OPTEASE滤器平均留置时间为977天(范围123 - 2584天),中位数为661天(n = 5)。所有滤器的平均留置时间为1125天(范围123 - 3582天),中位数为577天(n = 10)。所有患者在滤器取出后均出现下腔静脉(IVC)狭窄。1例患者取出滤器后出现IVC假性动脉瘤,后自行消退。1例患者有断裂的滤器支杆完全嵌入腔静脉壁。2例患者在临床随访中报告单侧腿部肿胀,其余患者未报告腿部肿胀或紧绷感。

结论

初步经验表明,TRAPEASE和OPTEASE滤器在延长留置时间后可以取出。

相似文献

1
Retrieval of TRAPEASE and OPTEASE Inferior Vena Cava Filters with Extended Dwell Times.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Oct;26(10):1519-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
2
Initial experience in 115 patients with the retrievable Cook Celect vena cava filter.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2009 Feb;53(1):64-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02039.x.
3
IVC filter retrieval in adolescents: experience in a tertiary pediatric center.
Pediatr Radiol. 2016 Apr;46(4):534-40. doi: 10.1007/s00247-015-3519-1. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
4
British Society of Interventional Radiology (BSIR) Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filter Registry.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Dec;36(6):1548-1561. doi: 10.1007/s00270-013-0606-2. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
5
The Jonas study: evaluation of the retrievability of the Cordis OptEase inferior vena cava filter.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 Nov;16(11):1439-45; quiz 1445. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000171699.57957.C7.
6
High-risk retrieval of adherent and chronically implanted IVC filters: techniques for removal and management of thrombotic complications.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Dec;20(12):1548-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.08.024. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
7
Clinical comparison of two optional vena cava filters.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Apr;18(4):505-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.02.007.
8
Retrievability of the recovery vena cava filter after dwell times longer than 180 days.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006 Feb;17(2 Pt 1):299-302. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000195153.32491.37.
9
OptEase and TrapEase vena cava filters: a single-center experience in 258 patients.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009 Sep;32(5):992-7. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9591-x. Epub 2009 May 16.
10
Fractured Bard Recovery, G2, and G2 express inferior vena cava filters: incidence, clinical consequences, and outcomes of removal attempts.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012 Feb;23(2):188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.10.005. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

2
Inferior vena cava filter misplacement in the right ovarian vein and successful removal by loop-snare technique in a patient with inferior vena cava agenesis.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2018 Dec 10;4(4):324-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2017.12.006. eCollection 2018 Dec.
3
Techniques for Retrieval of Permanent Inferior Vena Cava Filters.
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2017 Jun;34(2):208-212. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1602597. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
4
Inferior vena cava filter retrievals, standard and novel techniques.
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016 Dec;6(6):642-650. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2016.09.07.
5
A Critical Review of Available Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters and Future Directions.
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2016 Jun;33(2):79-87. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1582121.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验