Wilshire Candice L, Louie Brian E, Manning Kristin A, Horton Matthew P, Castiglioni Massimo, Gorden Jed A, Aye Ralph W, Farivar Alexander S, Vallières Eric
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Sep;100(3):979-88. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.030. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification of pulmonary adenocarcinomas identifies indolent lesions associated with low recurrence, superior survival, and the potential for sublobar resection. The distinction, however, is determined on the pathologic evaluation, limiting preoperative surgical planning. We sought to determine whether preoperative computed tomography (CT) characteristics could guide decisions about the extent of the pulmonary resection.
We reviewed the preoperative CT scans for 136 patients identified to have adenocarcinomas with lepidic features on the final pathologic evaluation. The solid component on CT was substituted for the invasive component, and patients were radiologically classified as adenocarcinoma in situ, 3 cm or less with no solid component; minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, 3 cm or less with a solid component of 5 mm or less; or invasive adenocarcinoma, exceeding 3 cm or solid component exceeding 5 mm, or both. Analysis of variance, t test, χ(2) test, and Kaplan-Meier methods were used for analysis.
The radiologic classification identified 35 adenocarcinomas in situ (26%) and 12 minimally invasive (9%) and 89 invasive adenocarcinoma (65%) lesions. At a 32-month median follow-up, patient outcomes associated with the radiologic classification were similar to the pathologic-based classification: the radiologic classification identified 14 of 16 patients with recurrent disease and all 6 who died of lung cancer. In addition, patients with radiologic adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma who underwent sublobar resections had no recurrence and 100% disease-free and overall survival at 5 years.
The radiologic classification of patients with lepidic adenocarcinomas is associated with similar oncologic and survival outcomes compared with the pathologic classification and may guide decision making in the approach to surgical resection.
国际肺癌研究协会/美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会的肺腺癌分类法确定了与低复发率、较高生存率以及亚肺叶切除可能性相关的惰性病变。然而,这种区分是通过病理评估来确定的,这限制了术前手术规划。我们试图确定术前计算机断层扫描(CT)特征是否能指导肺切除范围的决策。
我们回顾了136例在最终病理评估中被确定为具有鳞屑样特征腺癌患者的术前CT扫描。CT上的实性成分被视为浸润成分,患者在影像学上被分类为原位腺癌(3 cm或更小且无实性成分)、微浸润腺癌(3 cm或更小且实性成分5 mm或更小)或浸润性腺癌(超过3 cm或实性成分超过5 mm,或两者皆有)。采用方差分析、t检验、χ²检验和Kaplan-Meier方法进行分析。
影像学分类确定了35例原位腺癌(26%)、12例微浸润腺癌(9%)和89例浸润性腺癌(65%)病变。在中位随访32个月时,与影像学分类相关的患者预后与基于病理的分类相似:影像学分类确定了16例复发患者中的14例以及所有6例死于肺癌的患者。此外,接受亚肺叶切除的影像学原位腺癌和微浸润腺癌患者无复发,5年时无病生存率和总生存率均为100%。
与病理分类相比,鳞屑样腺癌患者的影像学分类与相似的肿瘤学和生存结果相关,并且可能指导手术切除方法的决策。