Viñas-Racionero Rosa, Raghavan Chitra, Soria-Verde Miguel Ángel, Prat-Santaolaria Remei
1 University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA.
2 John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, NY, USA.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2017 Apr;61(5):561-581. doi: 10.1177/0306624X15598165. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
The present descriptive study analyzes stalking in a sample of 278 Spanish court cases involving partner violence and contrasts the benefits of the new bill article 172ter, which criminalizes stalking, compared with the Organic Law 1/2004 on partner violence. Thirty-seven percent (37%) of the total sample included stalking behaviors, which manifested in intimidatory (60%) and controlling (45%) unwanted verbal communications (62%) and physical approaches (42%) that ended violently in a third of the cases (35%). Cases involving violent stalking, non-violent stalking, and physical violence without stalking were compared. A closer look at violent stalking cases uncovered that intimacy-seeking stalking behavior was concurrent with face-to-face aggression with a sharp object, whereas pursuit/control and invasive behavior were associated with property invasion and damage. Data not only support the contention that stalking should be criminalized regardless of the type of stalking behavior but also indicate that differences in the behavior might warrant different management interventions.
本描述性研究分析了278起涉及伴侣暴力的西班牙法庭案件样本中的跟踪行为,并将将跟踪行为定为犯罪的新法案第172条之三与关于伴侣暴力的2004年第1/2004号组织法进行了对比。总样本中有37% 的案件存在跟踪行为,表现为恐吓性(60%)和控制性(45%)的不受欢迎的言语交流(62%)和身体靠近(42%),其中三分之一的案件(35%)以暴力告终。对涉及暴力跟踪、非暴力跟踪以及无跟踪的身体暴力的案件进行了比较。仔细研究暴力跟踪案件发现,寻求亲密的跟踪行为与使用尖锐物体的面对面攻击同时发生,而追求/控制和侵犯行为则与财产侵犯和破坏有关。数据不仅支持无论跟踪行为的类型如何都应将跟踪行为定为犯罪的观点,而且还表明行为上的差异可能需要不同的管理干预措施。