Virk Sohaib A, Eslick Guy D
From the Whiteley-Martin Research Centre, Discipline of Surgery, the University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Aug;57(8):893-6. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000487.
We conducted a meta-analysis to systematically quantify the association between occupational exposure to aluminum and risk of Alzheimer disease (AD).
Electronic database searches were conducted up to March 2015 for controlled studies. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Three retrospective case-control studies, involving 1056 participants, met the criteria for inclusion. All studies used surrogate informants to ascertain exposure. Occupational aluminum exposure was not associated with AD (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.59 to 1.68), even in sensitivity analysis excluding studies with low-quality assessment scores (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 3.10).
The findings of the present meta-analysis do not support a causative role of aluminum in the pathogenesis of AD. Nevertheless, in the absence of prospective studies with more precise ascertainment of exposure, a role for aluminum cannot be definitively excluded.
我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以系统地量化职业性铝暴露与阿尔茨海默病(AD)风险之间的关联。
截至2015年3月,对对照研究进行电子数据库检索。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。
三项回顾性病例对照研究,涉及1056名参与者,符合纳入标准。所有研究均使用替代信息提供者来确定暴露情况。职业性铝暴露与AD无关(优势比,1.00;95%置信区间,0.59至1.68),即使在排除评估分数低的研究的敏感性分析中也是如此(优势比,1.06;95%置信区间,0.36至3.10)。
本荟萃分析的结果不支持铝在AD发病机制中的致病作用。然而,在缺乏更精确确定暴露情况的前瞻性研究的情况下,不能明确排除铝的作用。