Suppr超能文献

使用计算机断层血管造影诊断脑死亡的原始方案:比标准两阶段技术更好的选择?

Original Protocol Using Computed Tomographic Angiography for Diagnosis of Brain Death: A Better Alternative to Standard Two-Phase Technique?

作者信息

Sawicki Marcin, Sołek-Pastuszka Joanna, Jurczyk Krzysztof, Skrzywanek Piotr, Guziński Maciej, Czajkowski Zenon, Mańko Witold, Burzyńska Małgorzata, Safranow Krzysztof, Poncyljusz Wojciech, Walecka Anna, Rowiński Olgierd, Walecki Jerzy, Bohatyrewicz Romuald

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.

Clinic of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.

出版信息

Ann Transplant. 2015 Aug 6;20:449-60. doi: 10.12659/AOT.893808.

Abstract

BACKGROUND The application of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) for the diagnosis of brain death (BD) is limited because of the low sensitivity of the commonly used two-phase method consisting of assessing arterial and venous opacification at the 60th second after contrast injection. The hypothesis was that a reduction in the scanning delay might increase the sensitivity of the test. Therefore, an original technique using CTA was introduced and compared with catheter angiography as a reference. MATERIAL AND METHODS In a prospective multicenter trial, 84 clinically brain-dead patients were examined using CTA and catheter angiography. The sensitivities of original CTA technique, involving an arterial assessment at the 25th second and a venous assessment at the 40th second, and the standard CTA, involving an arterial and venous assessment at the 60th second, were compared to catheter angiography. RESULTS Catheter angiography results were consistent with the clinical diagnosis of BD in all cases. In comparison to catheter angiography, the sensitivity of original CTA technique was 0.93 (95%CI, 0.85-0.97; p<0.001) and 0.57 (95%CI, 0.46-0.68; p<0.001) for the standard protocol. The differences were statistically significant (p=0.03 for original CTA and p<0.001 for standard CTA). Decompressive craniectomy predisposes to a false-negative CTA result with a relative risk of 3.29 (95% CI, 1.76-5.81; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our original technique using CTA for the assessment of the cerebral arteries during the arterial phase and the deep cerebral veins with a delay of 15 seconds is a highly sensitive test for the diagnosis of BD. This method may be a better alternative to the commonly used technique.

摘要

背景

计算机断层血管造影(CTA)在脑死亡(BD)诊断中的应用受到限制,因为常用的两期法在注射造影剂后第60秒评估动脉和静脉造影剂充盈情况,其敏感性较低。研究假设是缩短扫描延迟可能会提高检测的敏感性。因此,引入了一种使用CTA的原始技术,并与作为参考的导管血管造影进行比较。

材料与方法

在一项前瞻性多中心试验中,对84例临床脑死亡患者进行了CTA和导管血管造影检查。将原始CTA技术(在第25秒进行动脉评估,在第40秒进行静脉评估)和标准CTA(在第60秒进行动脉和静脉评估)的敏感性与导管血管造影进行比较。

结果

在所有病例中,导管血管造影结果与BD的临床诊断一致。与导管血管造影相比,原始CTA技术的敏感性为0.93(95%CI,0.85 - 0.97;p<0.001),标准方案的敏感性为0.57(95%CI,0.46 - 0.68;p<0.001)。差异具有统计学意义(原始CTA为p = 0.03,标准CTA为p<0.001)。减压性颅骨切除术易导致CTA假阴性结果,相对风险为3.29(95%CI,1.76 - 5.81;p<0.001)。

结论

我们使用CTA在动脉期评估脑动脉和延迟15秒评估大脑深部静脉的原始技术是诊断BD的高度敏感检测方法。该方法可能是常用技术的更好替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验