Chin Paul C, Hachadorian Michael E, Pulido Pamela A, Munro Michelle L, Meric Gokhan, Hoenecke Heinz R
Sterling Ridge Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, The Woodlands, TX, USA.
Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education at Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Dec;24(12):1888-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.05.052. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with posterior wear of the glenoid and posterior subluxation of the humerus (Walch type B) presents a challenge to the treating surgeon. Our hypothesis was that glenoids with biconcavity (B2) would be associated with worse outcomes (functional scores and complications) than B1 glenoids.
We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data on 112 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (104 patients) with B glenoids. Preoperative computed tomography identified 64 B1 glenoids and 48 B2 glenoids (50 and 37 available for follow-up).
A significant difference between B1 and B2 glenoids was noted in average retroversion (11° vs. 16°; P < .001) and average posterior humeral subluxation (65% vs. 75%; P < .001). No significant difference was seen in mean age (69.5 vs. 69.2 years) or body mass index (28.5 vs. 27.4) at time of surgery. At average follow-up of 60 months (range, 23-120 months), glenoid component radiolucencies (51.6%, B1; 47.9%, B2), range of motion, preoperative and postoperative scores of the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, and patient satisfaction were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Four revisions (4.6%) were documented for acute postoperative infection (2.3%), subscapularis failure (1.1%), and glenoid loosening (1.1%).
Although biconcave glenoids commonly have more severe retroversion and posterior subluxation of the humerus, we were unable to find a clinical or radiographic difference in outcome of patients with B1 or B2 glenoids treated with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty at intermediate-term follow-up. Continued clinical and radiographic follow-up of these cohorts will be necessary to assess any future divergence in outcome.
原发性盂肱关节骨关节炎伴肩胛盂后方磨损及肱骨后方半脱位(瓦尔什B型)给主刀医生带来了挑战。我们的假设是,双凹形肩胛盂(B2型)与比B1型肩胛盂更差的治疗结果(功能评分和并发症)相关。
我们回顾性分析了前瞻性收集的112例采用B型肩胛盂的解剖型全肩关节置换术(104例患者)的数据。术前计算机断层扫描确定了64个B1型肩胛盂和48个B2型肩胛盂(50个和37个可供随访)。
B1型和B2型肩胛盂在平均后倾角度(11°对16°;P <.001)和平均肱骨后方半脱位情况(65%对75%;P <.001)上存在显著差异。手术时的平均年龄(69.5岁对69.2岁)或体重指数(28.5对27.4)无显著差异。平均随访60个月(范围23 - 120个月)时,两组在肩胛盂假体透亮线情况(B1型为51.6%,B2型为47.9%)、活动范围、术前和术后简化版上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷评分以及患者满意度方面均无显著差异。记录了4例翻修手术(4.6%),原因分别为术后急性感染(2.3%)、肩胛下肌功能障碍(1.1%)和肩胛盂松动(1.1%)。
虽然双凹形肩胛盂通常有更严重的后倾和肱骨后方半脱位,但在中期随访中,我们未能发现采用解剖型全肩关节置换术治疗的B1型或B2型肩胛盂患者在临床或影像学结果上存在差异。有必要对这些队列进行持续的临床和影像学随访,以评估未来治疗结果是否会出现差异。